Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:raf_3@msn.com: 108 ]

Total 108 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:36:34 -0700
As an owner of a great Triton IV, I just purchased a Corsair (not II), and have a couple of questions: The manager of my local HRO that was once a retail outlet for TenTec, said that according to Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00264.html (7,263 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:35:07 -0700
Thanks Barry. I had already had and enjoyed an OMNI V, but when I picked up the TRITON IV and put it into service, I was blown away by how quiet the receiver is. And, it's NB is far more effective th
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00267.html (9,449 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:42:30 -0700
Barry, Thanks. I just got word that my Corsair has shipped, and I'm sure anxious to check out it's performance. The TRITON may become my wee-hour, weak signal DX'er, and the Corsair my week-end, heav
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00269.html (12,281 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:04:19 -0700
Hello Richard, Yeah, I'm really enjoying the TRITON IV on 40m late-nite DX'ing. I also have a Cubic 103 (with PTO tuner), that's also a very simple to operate rig with very low noise level. But the T
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00272.html (9,416 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:12:40 -0700
I received my newly acquired Corsair (not II), s/n 718, and have a couple of questions: At cold start-up in the morning, it takes about a minute for the displayed frequency to stabilize and display t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00044.html (8,306 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:42:12 -0700
Well, at least I know now the issues aren't unique to my Corsair. I can live with the display one minute warm-up, but the ineffective NB prevents useability all too often. My noise level is frequentl
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00048.html (8,198 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:59:54 -0700
Bob, Yeah, the random number generator on the display is the display itself. The frequency itself is rock-solid, and after one minute, the display homes in on the actual frequency. Having struggled w
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00049.html (13,506 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:48:41 -0700
Yes, there's lots of room inside the TRITON. I really take advantage of the PBT and notch on the Corsair with heavy QRM...if my damnable noise isn't present, which is why I was focusing on improving
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00056.html (22,703 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:54:54 -0700
Wade, Yeah.......been there, done that. After a couple of months of no help from the power company, I bought an 18" ultrasonic parabolic dish and detector 3 months ago to pursue this problem, thinkin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00062.html (11,762 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:05:53 -0700
Gary, Wow! Do you have a Corsair or a Corsair II? If it's a Corsair, what is it's s/n? I was told by a former TenTec retailer that the early Corsairs had useless noise blankers. Mine is s/n 718. Do y
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00063.html (11,036 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] corsair display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:15:44 -0700
Thanks for the tips. I didn't know the ARRL would help with non-ham generated EMI. Thought they would only assist in resolving issues of complaints of ham-generated EMI. -- Original Message -- From:
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00064.html (7,960 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:48:38 -0700
Gary, A quick viewing of your QRZ page indicates that unless you've downgraded, you have a Corsair II. Checking the manual schematics for both the Corsair and the Corsair II, I find the noise blanker
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00077.html (12,669 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:43:32 -0700
My recently acquired Corsair II has a failed logic board UV eprom (MC68705P3S) that prevents me from operating CW. The eprom failure is the keyer "dit" input stuck close enough to a "low", that about
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00154.html (8,953 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:12:59 -0700
Oh, man! Clayton, you're my hero. The prom is a 28-pin, and is UV programmable, rather that EE programmable. I believe the programming of my prom is good. It's just an input gate that's stuck low. If
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00156.html (11,942 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:35:18 -0700
Hi Jerry, That's what I get for attempting to economize text. According to Motorola, either your terminology or mine is correct. Motorola says: "The MC68705P3 (High-Density NMOS) Microcomputer Unit (
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00159.html (12,785 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:41:11 -0700
Does anyone have a G3TXQ drop-in logic board kit that's surplus to their needs? If so, I could sure use one. Please contact me off-list. TNX es 73, Allen--W7GIF -- Original Message -- From: A R<mailt
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00160.html (15,602 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 03:16:09 -0700
Thanks, Steve. Let's see what sort of interest develops. I'm certain that your one-off cost comment is spot on. best 73, Allen--W7GIF -- Original Message -- From: Steve Hunt<mailto:steve@karinya.net>
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00163.html (9,871 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:23:47 -0700
Thanks, Steve. 73, Allen--W7GIF -- Original Message -- From: Steve Hunt<mailto:steve@karinya.net> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment<mailto:tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 6
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00167.html (10,533 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II UV EPROM failure (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 20:33:01 -0700
Geoff, Of course you're right, the UV is used only to erase the resident/existing program on a UV PROM. I knew that, and what I intended to convey to Clayton was that the PROM portion of the MC68705P
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00179.html (13,865 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] corsair 2 eprom (score: 1)
Author: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:35:33 -0700
Hi Spencer, Thanks for the response. Yes, I inspected the soldering and even the foil runs, since Garry at TT told me they had problems with the TT-produced pwb's. The board and soldering are all goo
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00188.html (9,230 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu