Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:deswynar@xplornet.ca: 192 ]

Total 192 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 08:07:39 -0500
Hi Roger, Sez who...? Jack's keying may well be a tad on the hard side, but his signal HARDLY emits "...key clicks out to over 1 KHz from his carrier frequency", IMHO...and I've copied him at some 30
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00226.html (9,909 bytes)

42. Topband: Solar Activity & Topband (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:07:32 -0500
Hi Guys, I'm hearing of all kinds of disruptions & negative effects that the recent outbreak on ol' Sol's visage has been having upon the higher bands... Yet, conditions for transcontinental QSOs her
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00359.html (6,552 bytes)

43. Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:46:31 -0500
Hi Guys, This morning, after calling a general "CQ" several times on an apparently vacant frequency, the passband of my receiver was inundated by someone deliberately sending a continuous string of r
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00061.html (8,024 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:48:33 -0500
Hi Herb, Interesting point...! According to either the ARRL "ANTENNA HANDBOOK", or ON4UN's "LOW-BAND DX HANDBOOK", the velocity factor of insulated wire placed atop the ground is 50%... I take that t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00099.html (7,452 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:34:05 -0500
Hi Guy, All this talk about "idealized" radial systems, vs. "compromised" radial fields, hearkens me back to the words of an old Rolling Stones song, to whit: "You can't always get what you want, but
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00111.html (9,135 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:09:53 -0500
Hi Guy, I thought that was exactly what I was doing here at my QTH, i.e. not NOT trying "anything", but at least doing "something". Far too many words of advice / "tribal knowledge" that I've seen ov
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00114.html (9,465 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band? (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:33 -0500
Hi Mike, I think you're confusing this with the so-called "Lowfers Band", from 160- to 190-KHz.. ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00199.html (8,702 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band? (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:48:34 -0500
Hi Again Mike, Yes, as I recall reading (in RAC's "The Canadian Amateur" magazine, I think), one had to apply for a LIMITED number of special permits in Canada to operate the band--Jack was successfu
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00200.html (8,906 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Vertical vs yagi (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:50:26 -0500
Hi Josep, By far, the absolute BEST antenna that I've ever used on 40-meters was an inverted 3-element Bobtail Array (dubbed "The Robert Tail Array" in an early edition of the ARRL's "ANTENNA COMPEND
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00222.html (8,003 bytes)

50. Topband: Mississippi on Topband (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:35:31 -0500
Good Day All, Someone mentioned here earlier that they were looking for a contact on 1.8-MHz with the State of Mississippi, in order to complete the requirements for their Topband QRP W.A.S. award...
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00235.html (6,510 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:16:28 -0500
Hi Jeff et al, I certainly have nothing against LotW, or the folks who swear by it. It is the "coming thing" IMHO, and given time will surely render hardcopy QSLs a place atop the scrap heap of Ham r
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00249.html (9,395 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:23:50 -0500
Hi Julius, Have you ever ventured forth onto the so-called "Lowfers Band" of 160- to 190-KHz, & listened for beacons...? I did, & one time I was rewarded with the thrill of hearing an "VE3"-based sta
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00255.html (10,793 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:25:46 -0500
Hi Paul, And therein lies the rub...! Imagine if you were mounting a DX-Pedition to some far-flung place, & your sponsors came up just short of all of your expenses--the balance would doubtlessly hav
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00266.html (10,159 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: 3C6A (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:06:43 -0500
Hi Guys, A look back through my late 1920's issues of QST magazine reveals a monthly column entitled, I believe, "PREHISTORIC SIGNALS". Therein, for all to behold, were the specific call signs of sta
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00378.html (10,295 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: 3C6A (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:31:45 -0500
Hi Roger, Quite true. I agree. I guess that wouldn't say too much about the honour & ethics of the person impersonating me, would it...?! ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ _________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00380.html (8,279 bytes)

56. Topband: "Artificial" Propagation...? (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:01:14 -0500
Hi All, An on-line friend recently sent me this timely link re. an upcoming NASA experiment that involves the releasing of an aluminum oxide "cloud" some 60 miles above earth: http://www.aopa.org/air
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00014.html (7,058 bytes)

57. Topband: The End of Another One... (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:17:26 -0400
Good Day All, Well, Spring sure has arrived early this year in this part of "VE3"-land--so early, in fact, that the XYL is making noises to-day about our starting to rake the lawn in preparation for
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00091.html (7,318 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: TB season (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:22:52 -0400
True enough... But alas & alack--sadly!--we are not all blessed with the acreage & wide-open spaces to indulge in our passion a full 12 months a year... Would it were so that we could ALL indulge in
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00104.html (8,222 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: It is not so much propagation (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:12:04 -0400
Hi Dave, I do here...! But the trend for "CQ DX" calls is so common, if I am invariably spotted, more often than not I'm shown as calling for DX, when a comfy cozy rag chew would do me just fine...!
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00178.html (8,879 bytes)

60. Topband: Global Warming, Or What...?! (score: 1)
Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:14:38 -0400
Good Day All, Just an interesting observation made here by yours truly... The other day I was logging the receipt here of a batch of QSL cards that arrived via the buro, & I happened to notice--as co
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00222.html (7,273 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
This search system is powered by Namazu