| To: | Mike & Coreen Smith <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band? |
| From: | Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:33 -0500 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 2012-02-13, at 10:03 AM, Mike & Coreen Smith wrote: > Didn't I read somewhere that this band only allowed 1W ERP and antennas less > than 10m high or am I thinking of another allocation? Hi Mike, I think you're confusing this with the so-called "Lowfers Band", from 160- to 190-KHz.. ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band?, Mike & Coreen Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band?, Eddy Swynar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band?, Mike & Coreen Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band?, Jose E. Ribeiro Sa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |