Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gdaught6@stanford.edu: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] silly LM470 question (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu (gdaught6@stanford.edu)
Date: Sun Jul 27 15:20:43 2003
Yes, I have this sort of a "mounting" scheme, and it's worked fine for some years now. I've used a couple of big nylon tie-wraps to hold the plate in place so it doesn't flop around. When the tower i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-07/msg00436.html (7,537 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] (Fwd) [NCCC] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu (gdaught6@stanford.edu)
Date: Sat Jun 14 12:37:34 2003
Hi All, Here's a query from a fellow ham. I'm not sure if he's a towertalk member, so I'm posting it in his behalf. If you can respond, please do so direct to him, not to me. mni tnx es vy 73, Hi: I'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00203.html (7,025 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Advice (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@Stanford.edu (gdaught6@Stanford.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 24 12:04:44 2003
Hi, N6TQS wrote... They found that flat black was NOT a good paint scheme for night fighters/intruders like the Northrop P-61 Black Widow and the night version of the P-38... it resulted in a visible
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00431.html (8,203 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] compass question (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu (gdaught6@stanford.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 12 11:22:42 2003
Nobody has allowed for the fact that the compass itself isn't perfect! It has some "deviation" from the correct direction,and that usually depends on the indicated direction. Here's the full story...
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00284.html (8,701 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] BBC report on bird kills at towers (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:41:12 -0700
I'd have to believe that such a report is, in fact, FROM a wind generator, or a windbag, as my daddy used to call them. Our local birds seem to appreciate my tower and antenna, except when there is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00763.html (9,390 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:59:53 -0700
Well, I think the report IS scientific! It isn't complete (and the authors admit that) in that it doesn't compare a large number of paths, with a large number of ionosperic conditions. It does indeed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00285.html (9,346 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:18:01 -0700
I calculate under 1.25 cubic yards for that hole. You're going to have a LOT of concrete left over. 3' x 3' x 6' is two yards. 73, _______________________________________________ See: http://www.msco
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00069.html (7,235 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Newbie (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:32:06 -0700
Don't worry, the speed will come back quickly. As always, the key is PRACTICE! I have tailored a couple of pairs of stereo headphones by putting a series resistor (determined by experiment) in the li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00272.html (7,844 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Tashjian LM470 review requested (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@Stanford.edu
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:02:05 -0700
On 15 Oct 2003 at 13:24, RWMaylott@aol.com wrote about Kashjian towers: Well, I got a TriEx while the name still existed. (Maybe the last one!?) I have about 8 feet of mast in the top section of my t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00335.html (8,895 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: 40m beam with wires dangling down (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@Stanford.edu
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:26:40 -0800
Hi all, I can't visualize how this works. On an aluminum antenna, sure. But how does hanging a wire on the end of the fiberglas tubes of a steppir do much of anything? If you can get electrical conta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00142.html (10,373 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:34:25 -0800
My concrete guy (actually retired concrete guy, but doing occasional jobs to pick up a few bucks) explained it to me this way, which seemed very logical. You can take the forms off after 24+ hours, b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00131.html (9,295 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Weight of Chromolly (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@Stanford.edu
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:13:57 -0800
That seems high to me. I got one a couple of years ago, (20 feet long, 1/4 inch wall, and... the missing dimension... 2" outside diameter) and I recall it being something like 115 pounds. At least th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00320.html (8,263 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] chrome-moly tubing (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@Stanford.edu
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:16:02 -0800
Maybe my 115-pounder was 3/8" wall. 73, George T. Daughters, K6GT _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Statio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00322.html (6,451 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Wire (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 12:20:02 -0700
It's thin, yes. But it's also unruly... I'm prettty sure it's aluminum clad steel, like copperclad. It probably is. 73, George T. Daughters, K6GT _______________________________________________ See:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00414.html (8,102 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] URI magic antennas (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:52:14 -0700
Yes, it is important, because the "details" of how and why it works, and how it is built, are generally kept from public or professional scrutiny. "Proprietary information" you know. Unfortunately, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00155.html (8,650 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] URI magic antennas (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:59:06 -0700
What about supeconducting loading coils and/or elements? One could generate VERY high currents with low losses (unless you count the energy requirement of keeping an RF-transparent thermos of liquid
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00157.html (9,559 bytes)

17. RE: [TowerTalk] Archeological find in my Anchor hole (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:32:19 -0700
And don't forget the goat! Remember what Hans, K0HB, wrote: (as closely as I can recall) "There is nothing mysterious about RF propagation. There are perfectly valid technical reasons that you should
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00155.html (8,646 bytes)

18. RE: [TowerTalk] Hole Digging Question (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:27:27 -0700
OK, I can't stand it. I'll offer what my grandfather taught me. When you have a lot of dirt in a situation like this, just "Dig a hole and bury it!" 73, George T. Daughters, K6GT ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00656.html (8,813 bytes)

19. RE: [TowerTalk] Belden 8285 (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:49:18 -0700
< snip > Test the loss. Hook up a dummy load at one end, and a transmitter and in-line power meter at the other end. Put 100 w (measured by the power meter) at 28 MHz into it. Then, shift the power m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00401.html (8,589 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:25:29 -0700
< snip > Exactly right! And if SWR>1.0 then the impedance at the transmitter end of the line changes with differing line lengths, so a change in line length can sometimes make it easier to match for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00183.html (8,072 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu