Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kb9cry@comcast.net: 288 ]

Total 288 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:40:06 +0000
Using brass or copper to join copper would require getting the bond metal Yes it is and it's called CadWeld. Their "OneShot" products are awesome. Go to erico.com click on the Cadweld button and then
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00491.html (8,964 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning, surge protection (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 17:25:02 -0600
The following two companies make the best units. Check out the technical literature on their websites for the complete skinny on what to do. I never disconnect and never have had a problem; even with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00184.html (9,121 bytes)

23. Re: [Towertalk] Connecting grounds to towers (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:12:11 -0600
I can't help but make a few comments found below: Sean rf wrote: Suggestions for grounding: When attaching your #4 solid copper to the ground rod, use a non-oxidizing compound between your ground cla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00416.html (17,668 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 11, Issue 56 (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:22:49 +0000
I also believe both the PolyPhaser and ICE website technical articles warn against non metallic towers. I don't recall their exact reasoning but I believe it's along similar lines as stated. If you'r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00504.html (10,046 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:23:34 +0000
All that dipoles do on 160M is to warm the clouds above your house. I'd shunt feed the tower. That's what I do and it's a killer. Just remember that whatever you do, you'll want to investigate low ba
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00008.html (9,254 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Low Band Receiving Antennas (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:19:18 +0000
Here we go again. Make sure you search around these websites for all the info. http://www.hard-core-dx.com/nordicdx/antenna/loop/index.html http://www.angelfire.com/md/k3ky/page37.html http://www.w8j
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00013.html (7,822 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor replacement (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:18:14 +0000
What I would do is to attach a pipe clamp (muffler clamp or actual piping clamp) onto the mast above the thrust bearing. Now the weight of the mast/ants will be borne on the top of the bearing. Then
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00035.html (8,343 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor replacement (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:39:15 +0000
Using a gin pole to support the weight of this assembly might be pushing it's limits but I must strongly remind everyone that using the keeper bolt in the pointed top section to hold the assembly is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00037.html (9,520 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 20:08:27 +0000
I new to 160M and am always learning but I'd like to reiterate a main point in your msg Rich and that is hearing is usually more important than transmitting. If you can't hear 'em you can't work 'em.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00040.html (8,634 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m antennas (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:19:47 -0600
And if I may add a comment: Jim Jarvis wrote: 6) revisit #3....somebody suggested an on-ground beverage. If your ground is actually 30' below the earth's surface, or 20, or 10, this might be a good s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00058.html (7,822 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] AlfaSPID rotor comments (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:59:46 -0600
Go for it. Run don't walk, you'll never look back. I have one up turning my 3 el. 40M beam, 32 ft boom, 42 ft. elements. It has no trouble with that. I really like the small control box; you use an e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00060.html (8,620 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor replacement (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:24:41 -0600
I'd like to just reiterate that it doesn't matter how many thrust bearings one has on the mast, those centering screws are not meant to hold any of the vertical loads of the mast/antenna assembly. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00076.html (9,372 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] AlfaSPID rotor comments (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:33:10 +0000
Yup, the Spid has a very simple yet robust design. Nice worm gear system, no brake, no stops. Just two wires for the motor (12-24 VDC). Direction is switched in the controller by simply switching the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00083.html (10,832 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:50:04 -0600
If the tower has angle iron type of legs, then you lower the tower section into the hole after the rebar cage has been installed and support it off the bottom of the pit with solid concrete bricks. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00104.html (10,268 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] HELP!!!!!!!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:23:42 -0600
The following statements are my personal opinions: 1. I hate crank ups. You can't climb them (if you like your fingers and toes) and therefore you must use a ladder which is far wobblier than a nice
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00157.html (9,397 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] Popups (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:25:07 +0000
Can we quite this thread and get back to towers and antennas? Kwityer--ing everyone; this isn't eHam! Sri for that shot but really now. And what are popups anyway? I use Netscape and have popups disa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00183.html (6,612 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternatives to Rohn tower (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:57:51 +0000
If one looks at the photos of some installations I see slip joint type of connections rather than the flat plate ends shown on the pdf views. I'd imagine they'd make an interface if there is a differ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00443.html (9,443 bytes)

38. RE: [TowerTalk] One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:49:41 +0000
I would agree 5 radials just won't cut it and your theory of impedance changing during rain is probably right on. Also your planned number of radials of 12 - 24 is also low. The best bet is 60 1/4 wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00481.html (10,905 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:31:29 +0000
I wish to apologize to the group for stirring this debate up. I think it's good discussion but let's not rehash old information that is already in the archives. I think I started this by responding t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00516.html (9,334 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] None (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:37:16 +0000
Wishing to brag; check out my new 40M antenna & tower erected this summer/fall. It really works well. The website pages have a lot of info and piks of the tower install, the antenna mods, and antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00523.html (7,186 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu