Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mark@alignedsolutions.com: 225 ]

Total 225 documents matching your query.

201. [VHFcontesting] CO80 activation, CQ VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:19:29 -0700
Hi. I am planning on activating CO80 again during the first day of CQ VHF contest next weekend. I expect my main effort will be on 50 MHz, but I will take some gear for 144 Mhz. The site I have in mi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00022.html (7,546 bytes)

202. [VHFcontesting] IOS mapping apps for ham radio (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:29:17 -0700
Hi: Does anyone have any suggestions re currently available IOS applications that can display the units current location on maps and satellite imagery (while out of cellular coverage) and provide Mai
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00034.html (8,057 bytes)

203. Re: [VHFcontesting] IOS mapping apps for ham radio (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 22:21:54 -0700
Thanks all. Many useful suggestions were received and I have become re acquainted with the Ham Square app. 73 Mark S VE7AFZ mark@alignedsolutions.com 604 762 4099 ____________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00037.html (9,183 bytes)

204. [VHFcontesting] VE7AFZ/R plans in the contest and afterwards (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:36:15 -0700
Sorry for any odd formatting issues. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00042.html (9,565 bytes)

205. Re: [VHFcontesting] VE7AFZ/R plans in the contest and afterwards (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 19:39:36 -0700
Also I expect to run a mix of analog and digital on the usual frequencies. I will try and keep my eye on the band scope on the 7300 and qsy as needed. I expect to make at least a few SSB cq calls as
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00043.html (10,867 bytes)

206. [VHFcontesting] CO92 visit update (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:19:25 -0700
Hi: Thanks to everyone who tried to work me in CO92 on Monday morning. I was able to complete two MSK144 contacts with stations who had proposed skeds. I subsequently called CQ towards the PNW / Vanc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00060.html (7,965 bytes)

207. [VHFcontesting] FT4 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:24:23 -0700
Hi I am curious to hear from anyone who used FT4 during the CQ VHF contest. I don't recall seeing any activity on the 50 MHz FT4 frequency on my band scope when I was in CO80 on Saturday, but I may h
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00062.html (7,789 bytes)

208. Re: [VHFcontesting] An idea for the sprints. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:31:41 -0700
Yes the one time that I recall roving during a 4 hour sprint the timing was very tight for me but I have a lengthy drive between viable roving sites and need at least 15 min to setup when stopping at
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-10/msg00017.html (18,216 bytes)

209. [VHFcontesting] WSJT-x version 2.2.1 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:59:10 -0800
Hi: I am starting to put together my gear for the January contest. I don't really follow the WSJT-x mailing lists that closely anymore. Any thoughts on using WSJT-x version 2.2.1 in the contest ? (Or
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00024.html (7,625 bytes)

210. Re: [VHFcontesting] WSJT-x version 2.2.1 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:41:17 -0800
Thanks All for the on and off list advice. At this point I believe I will load the latest software version onto a spare laptop as a plan B and will likely continue to mostly run 2.2.1 on my primary l
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00028.html (11,263 bytes)

211. [VHFcontesting] Fwd: VE7AFZ/R update re the January contest (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:54:53 -0800
_______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00034.html (8,370 bytes)

212. Re: [VHFcontesting] SO2R 6m/2m 6m causing S9 noise on 2m (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:39:54 -0800
Hi Chuck. I have recently started using a filter between my 2M radio and the antenna when I run my 6M and 2M roving antennas on the same mast. It seemed to improve matters considerably. That being sa
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00048.html (8,874 bytes)

213. Re: [VHFcontesting] SO2R 6m/2m 6m causing S9 noise on 2m (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:39:25 -0800
I suppose each situation is different. During this contest I tried using a 54 MHz and down low pass filter (between my amp and antenna) when roving but I took it out as I could not detect it making a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00053.html (12,254 bytes)

214. Re: [VHFcontesting] Prpposal: change SOFM to allow more bands (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:49:12 -0800
At first glance I don't see any issues with this (other than the possible burden this would place on the contest organizers.) I agree about the lack of contest activity on 6M FM. I am quite confident
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00072.html (9,684 bytes)

215. Re: [VHFcontesting] Prpposal: change SOFM to allow more bands (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:54:40 -0800
Yep.. I carry a 1.2 GHz HT, an Alinco 222 / 927 HT, and a 50, 144, 432 HT with me on almost every rove I go on. They get enough use to make it worthwhile to charge up the batteries and pack them up e
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00073.html (10,233 bytes)

216. Re: [VHFcontesting] Prpposal: change SOFM to allow more bands (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:31:39 -0800
The antenna bandwidth / VSWR issues are real issues in my view on some bands. I used to carry a dedicated FM whip antenna just for 52.525 (and I believe at least one other rover in the PNW also did s
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00084.html (16,063 bytes)

217. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:13:44 -0800
Thanks Chuck you have largely captured my views re FT8. 73 Mark S VE7AFZ mark@alignedsolutions.com 604 762 4099 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontestin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00131.html (9,766 bytes)

218. Re: [VHFcontesting] A comment for those turning in their mics due to FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:58:04 -0800
I seem to recall seeing something along these lines last year. The point of the message sent via Ft8 seemed obvious to me at the time. 73 Mark S VE7AFZ mark@alignedsolutions.com 604 762 4099 ________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00150.html (10,202 bytes)

219. Re: [VHFcontesting] The impact of the digital modes on the January VHF Contest and some suggestions on dealing with those impacts (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 11:43:12 -0800
For what it is worth, several years ago I tried encouraging locals who were not into VHF and up contesting to get on the air during VHF and up contests. I found the results were mixed and I felt I ha
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-02/msg00026.html (13,734 bytes)

220. Re: [VHFcontesting] The lowest VHF band (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 12:32:54 -0800
I recall operating during a winter 10M only contest a few years ago. Despite not really having a proper 10M antenna it was still fun. Thanks for the reminder. 73 Mark S VE7AFZ mark@alignedsolutions.c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-02/msg00029.html (8,165 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu