Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:SawyerEd@Earthlink.net: 493 ]

Total 493 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:55:14 -0500
Guys, you are all missing the best way to police the offenders. Work them but don't log them. If they see their UBN rate climbing, they will change their practice. After all, they are trying to win.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00525.html (8,741 bytes)

162. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:19:31 -0500
The reason I believe it is acceptable to work them and not log them is because if you run out of patience in waiting for them to sign, then you honestly don't know what to log. I believe its no diffe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00578.html (8,484 bytes)

163. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:33:48 -0500
Yuri, No that is not what I am saying. I am saying that the offender has not delivered on his obligation of the valid Q by not signing. And therefore while the Q is "loggable" it ultimately fails to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00019.html (7,567 bytes)

164. [CQ-Contest] How close is too close? (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:55:47 -0500
It is interesting that I hear all these great reports of how wonderful the (plug in your favorite radio here) receiver is for close channel separation and brick wall blah blah blah. Usually the vener
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00166.html (8,331 bytes)

165. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer had finally arrived (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:08:44 -0500
For the first time, I can say, that skimmer is finally making a noticeable impact out there. As likely the most active Vermont station out there this weekend, I was a needed "mult" for most. I notice
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00167.html (8,255 bytes)

166. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 05:56:10 -0400
Always amazes me, the whole WRTC process. 50% of the participants have not qualified to go, yet go every event. Now these, non-qualifiers can operate the entire contest just by virtue of being long t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00119.html (8,400 bytes)

167. Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:33:20 -0400
The rules in CQ WW state as "call sign alerting assistance of any kind" and "remote receivers" are not allowed. The rules of ARRL DX state as "use of spotting assistance or automated, multi-channel d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00207.html (8,827 bytes)

168. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012 (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:59:28 -0400
Yuri, I have to agree with Sean. Club callsigns do not give you privileges of the trustee by default. The trustee needs to be in the "control operator" mode in order for his/her privileges to dominat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00230.html (8,756 bytes)

169. [CQ-Contest] KP2MM - Club Call (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:06:18 -0400
In all of this discussion, there is the missing element that the callsign used, KP2MM, is a club call, and KV4FZ is the trustee. N2TTA was granted permission to use the callsign by the trustee. That
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00328.html (7,480 bytes)

170. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ contest submission deadline getting (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:03:27 -0400
I personally think that 8 days is a much better balance for this. The Monday morning after the next weekend following the contest. I often end up travelling for business right after these contests be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00300.html (7,414 bytes)

171. Re: [CQ-Contest] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:01:01 -0400
I think it would be great to add more sections to Sweepstakes. There is no contest more boring on a Sunday afternoon than sweepstakes when you have all 80 in the bag. The best thing that could ever h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00088.html (7,513 bytes)

172. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Category Weighting Factor (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:42:15 -0400
As might be expected, I have followed this topic for many years since, like Syl and Nate, I am a competitive LP contester. In order to see the reality here, you need to look way beyond the portion of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00271.html (9,963 bytes)

173. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:51:27 -0400
I must say that I was surprised to read this in such a prominent position of the article and with as much attention. I don't hear it often and wouldn't even make my top 10 list of pet peeves for cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00334.html (9,212 bytes)

174. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 02:03:10 -0400
Interesting thread. I think Jim and Pete are both right. The key is to jostle and tale charge as necessary but not let the casual op even know what is going on. By definition, the casual op is oblivi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00006.html (7,273 bytes)

175. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bob Cox, K3EST, Retires as CQWW Contest Director (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:38:52 -0400
A score that would have ?blown away? the EU SOAB HP record is characterized as a ?"missing" scores were inadvertently left out of the results, but both of them were to be listed as Checklogs.? Are yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00075.html (8,044 bytes)

176. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bob Cox, K3EST, Retires as CQWW Contest Director (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:39:06 -0400
4O3A reported an 11.6 M score in CQWW CW 2011 on 3830. The record at the time was I believe 8.5M Net. 4O3A is not listed anywhere in the results. But his score was submitted in the received logs. Ed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00077.html (9,717 bytes)

177. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions not to the next CQWW Contest Director butto (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:44:06 -0400
I think it is a good idea to get some opinion on the table for the next CQ WW Director. Unlike Yuri, I disagree with cranking down more than already suggested. I propose enforcing the tools already a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00111.html (8,500 bytes)

178. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer Bashing - Now Distance Based Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:43:16 -0500
"Those ops in W1-2-3-4 that don't want distance based scoring?can't possibly know how boring a DX contest can be out west. Just look at how few W6/W7 logs with over 25 hours of activity have been rep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00320.html (7,971 bytes)

179. [CQ-Contest] LOTW and Contest Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:23:30 -0500
I am sure this has been asked before, but why is it that contest logs are not just automatically uploaded onto LOTW. The revenue is on the confirmation side so it would seem to be in the economic int
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00115.html (6,819 bytes)

180. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW and Contest Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:20:30 -0500
It seems to me that if LOTW focused on being a clearinghouse initially and a validator only when DXCC was applied for...it would be quite easy. Have CQ or ARRL submit only the "final logs" to LOTW. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00119.html (10,140 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu