Mail Archive Search: <+from:cconn@abacom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:cconn@abacom.com: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Karlnet] Speaking of Demarc (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:14:23 -0500 (EST); Hello, If this is the case, please post a link of a screenshot of a wireless link test using these cards. They use the same firmware as Demarc cards according to the netgate.com site, therefore I thi; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00060.html (17,440 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] Speaking of Demarc (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:16:30 -0500 (EST); ANY recent intersil-based firmware does not report it properly. Chris --; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00061.html (20,701 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] Speaking of Demarc (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:54:21 -0500 (EST); Don't you find it strange that you always have a super-strong SNR??? Have you tested using cards that reliably report signal strengths? You will notice that the Intersil is always very generous to re; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00065.html (20,636 bytes)
4. [Karlnet] 4.44 released (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:21:15 -0500; http://www.karlnet.com/Documents/ReleaseNotes/KarlBridgeKernelReleaseNotes.htm; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00068.html (6,948 bytes)
5. Re: [Karlnet] PPP Protocol Bridged (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:08:56 -0400; Intercom - Roberto Ravetti wrote: Kevin and others: I am working with PPPoE through PtP Bridged links. I have to Bridged ALL protocols, if no, PPPoE directly not work. With binary version Karlnet 4.3; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00105.html (7,963 bytes)
6. Re: [Karlnet] KN-100/200 with PoE overheats (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:16:02 -0500; No, we don't use. Usually we put boards into waterproof plastic boxes ~ 12'x8'x3' to attach them near antennas. Don't think any heatsink can cool it with such small volume of air. Previously we power; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00169.html (9,053 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:18:06 -0400; Hello, I find it curious that people use ICMP rtt to measure anything. This is even flawed in tradition land-based networking for various reasons, however compound the fact that the Karlnet polling a; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00051.html (9,860 bytes)
8. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:25:40 -0400; Also, there seems to be some debate about whether this is a problem or not - can you clarify if Karlnet see this as a problem or just the nature of how polling works? Hello, I won't speak for Karlnet; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00056.html (10,784 bytes)
9. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:34:13 -0400; Bob Hrbek wrote: The problem that I am seeing is not only dropped pings on links with perfect SNR (25?) but complete outages for the CPE for a few minutes, sometimes. This is affecting multiple sites; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00058.html (10,179 bytes)
10. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:51:17 -0400 (EDT); Hello, Yes, 1000+ms or more (for other reasons than base congestion) can be indicative of other issues. I am still curious; the people at that say that 15dBm SNR or less causes this, are they using 1; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00060.html (9,140 bytes)
11. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:42:09 -0400; Norm Young wrote: Hi Chris, Perhaps it's a perception problem...but I've been noticing some pretty tough times on my VOIP phone as well, and I'm wondering where it's coming from. Do you have an alter; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00066.html (9,976 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] vlan's (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:11:11 -0400; Bob Hrbek wrote: I can't send a ping packet larger than 1496 The karlnet "superframe" probably doesn't happen enough. This is on a ptp link as well with polling disabled. Hello, I believe that the ma; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00137.html (10,243 bytes)
13. Re: [Karlnet] Jitter (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:12:07 -0400; Norm Young wrote: Does anyone have any idea why a Karlnet TC base that was fine a few customers ago (no more than 25 customers on this AP), would suddenly start showing all sorts of ping time jitter?; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00139.html (8,292 bytes)
14. Re: [Karlnet] Ping time differences (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:16:16 -0400 (EDT); Probably not a problem. The newer polling algorithm I understand is somewhat adaptive; if your client is not doing anything, the base station can care to other tasks. Besides, ICMP round trip times a; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00146.html (9,501 bytes)
15. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:39:41 -0400; Caleb Carroll wrote: Could be. I would suggest you downgrade to 4.31 firmware and see if the problem still exists. 4.43k is whack. Hello, 4.43K may cause some problems for some people (I don't recall; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00063.html (10,614 bytes)
16. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:48:30 -0400; Bruno Lopes F. Cabral wrote: Hi there I did some tests with some 4.x builds I have that don't load any tertiary firmware, and the retransmit problem does not exist when the base station radio is usin; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00065.html (10,188 bytes)
17. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 18:41:43 -0400; Problems with v4.43k firmware: I guess the question of up/downgrading is a matter of what problem you are trying to solve. I don't like trading a solution for a new problem or problems so I've downgr; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00071.html (11,329 bytes)
18. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:08:32 -0400; helio@compuland.com.br wrote: On 9 Jul 2003 at 16:39, Chris Conn wrote: We have found this to cause mild to severe retransmit percentages in the base stations. The simple fact of upgrading to 4.43K (; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00074.html (9,028 bytes)
19. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:15:06 -0400; office wrote: I also find that retransmits increase with 4.43K! from 3-5% to 8-10% Chivu Hello, Therefore, there are other systems in the field that exhibit what I am seeing. I have found the increas; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00076.html (8,148 bytes)
20. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:18:43 -0400; helio@compuland.com.br wrote: Hello, What magnitude of increase of retransmits was seen when upgrading to 4.43K on the base? Is hard to pick the exact figure, but I needed to downgrade to 4.43d beta; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00081.html (9,488 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]