Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mcw1wjw9@optonline.net: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rover antenna question (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Fri Aug 1 14:16:19 2003
Hello Rovers, I have a question for the rovers on the list. What type of antennas are you using for 903MHz and up? Do you prefer loop yagis, regular yagi, or a dish? Thanks Warren - K2BM
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00003.html (7,244 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Rover antenna question (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Sat Aug 2 09:24:26 2003
I got plenty of answers to my question. Looks like the majority of you rovers use loopers for 903 to 3.4. with some of you using dish antennas all the way up! I mountain top with the N2NK guys and we
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00012.html (7,555 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Fri Jul 18 08:49:15 2003
I still do not see how this is different from using PacketCluster, and therefore making the station ASSISTED mode! Warren - K2BM
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00082.html (10,699 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Fri Jul 18 13:08:00 2003
I sorry but I don't see it that way. Other then no digipeating, I have still been given information about another station that I have NOT gathered on my own. In this case my assist if from my other r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00084.html (9,617 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Fri Jul 18 13:47:52 2003
I respectfully disagree. My COMPUTER has gathered the information, I personally did not. Other then setting up the computer, TNC and radio I did nothing ACTIVELY to gather this information. I could
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00086.html (10,269 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Fri Jul 18 15:20:08 2003
Tree, you've hit the nail perfectly and sent it home with one shot! It's sort of like our discussion about skeds made before the contest, I now agree with you, they don't "feel" right either. Yes, bu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00088.html (10,205 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Fri Jul 18 15:40:36 2003
Tree, you've hit the nail perfectly and sent it home with one shot! It's sort of like our discussion about skeds made before the contest, I now agree with you, they don't "feel" right either. Yes, bu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00089.html (10,059 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Sat Jul 19 18:04:23 2003
Tree, Well, I haven't heard much from the advocates of this mode to bolster their cause. I guess they have written me off. Warren - K2BM
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00095.html (8,577 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Sun Jul 20 13:40:50 2003
First, I believe SO2R is not just limited to HF contesting at all. It was coined there the describe someone in the Single-Op category using 2 Radios. I believe that the best Single-Op VHF contesters
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00097.html (11,579 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Sun Jul 20 18:08:50 2003
Maybe the ARRL Contest Desk needs to look at this again... 73 Warren Walsh - K2BM
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00099.html (9,696 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Mon Jul 21 06:28:45 2003
Hi Dave, I'm sorry but I don't think this is a private conversation. I have questions about this mode for Single-Op use and wanted information. I think that the VHFContesting email list is the PROPER
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00113.html (10,634 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] Re: Why we ... YADA YADA YADA (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Mon Jul 28 14:57:44 2003
Why? Does the list require him to give his call? He is not using an alias, or hiding his identity. Maybe he just forgot to sign his message. What amazes me is how many individuals get so up-tight whe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00206.html (9,842 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Re: Why we ... YADA YADA YADA (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Mon Jul 28 15:52:49 2003
No, it's not I don't see your name in my statement. If that's true, then why do these "rumors" persist? I heard so many stories from many different people about rovers who show up make one contact an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00211.html (10,238 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] re: captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Tue Jul 29 09:20:59 2003
I think the one item everyone is overlooking - the Rover has to submit his log in order to see if this is a problem. If none of these alleged "Captive Rover" logs are turned in, the just become "UNIQ
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00245.html (10,065 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] re: captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Tue Jul 29 10:13:36 2003
This is true. However since this is NOT AGAINST the rules, just the SPIRIT of competition, it appears to be non-issue for most of the other competitors. I'm not sure if there is even a penalty for "B
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00253.html (9,796 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] Re: captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Tue Jul 29 15:02:13 2003
Dennis, I'm not positive, but I believe you're missing our point. We WANT you to continue to rove, but we would also appreciate if ALL the rovers would make your kind of effort. Work EVERYONE they he
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00267.html (13,351 bytes)

17. [VHFcontesting] captive rovers = Red Herring (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren J. Walsh)
Date: Wed Jul 30 08:04:52 2003
Ev and the list, I went to the list archive to see what Tree's original question was: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/vhfcontesting/2003-July/002684.html I see mention from Tree of it being aga
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00297.html (9,894 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] captive rovers = Red Herring - TYPO!!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Wed Jul 30 17:11:52 2003
The above line should have been: I see "NO" mention from Tree of it being against the rule, and NO request for a rule change. Sorry for the typo! 73 Warren - K2BM
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00315.html (9,612 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] Skeds (score: 1)
Author: mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:53 2003
Correct If you know of a better list then a national VHF contest list, the let us know! Use the delete key! Then don't make any! Warren
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02038.html (7,953 bytes)

20. [VHFcontesting] N2NK September 2004 Plans (score: 1)
Author: Warren Walsh <mcw1wjw9@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 08:12:41 -0400
The Normanoch VHF Contest Club - N2NK will once again be at our "Mountaintop" (well for NJ it's a mountain) location in FN21oe for the September VHF contest. We will have bands from 6M to 1296MHz wit
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00045.html (6,926 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu