Mail Archive Search: <+from:mgilmer@gnlp.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:mgilmer@gnlp.com: 89 ]

Total 89 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] High Voltage with no filament supply (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:29:25 -0500; Is it safe (for the tubes, that is) to apply hi-voltage to a tube without filament voltage? If it matters, they are 3CX800s. Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submission; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00391.html (6,743 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Little amps (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:46:46 -0500; On Friday, November 26, 1999 6:00 PM, Alek Petkovic [SMTP:vk6apk@eon.net.au] wrote: Sounds a bit like the 200W or higher (peak music power) "ratings" on some amplified computer speakers. Mike N2MG --; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00547.html (7,302 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Z80 emulator for ARD230 repair (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 11:31:41 -0500; II hate to post this cross-reflector but it touches many "worlds". Please forgive the multiple intrusion. Does anyone out there have/know of a Z80 emulator? I have Advanced Radio Devices' ARD230A amp; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00389.html (8,409 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Eimac care and feeding (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:33:00 -0500; my you This is a question I've often had. In the US, it's generally (always?) legal to photocopy copyrighted material for personal (e.g., research) use - or so I've been told by lawyers. If I scan so; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00384.html (9,310 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Eimac care and feeding (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 08:49:11 -0500; On Thursday, November 18, 1999 12:21 AM, Jon Ogden [SMTP:jono@enteract.com] wrote: that Eimac You are absolutely correct, Jon. Many (dare I say most?) companies use their Marketing dept to "run" the; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00383.html (9,573 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Eimac care and feeding/poor service (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:17:30 -0500; Pardon my naivete, I take it "Richardsons" is a manufacturers' representative? out Sounds like "Richardsons" and Eimac are both "arrogant" using your definition. I got my hard copy data sheet in a re; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00372.html (9,914 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Eimac care and feeding (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:16:39 -0500; been in the same state I was afraid of that (sections 3+ are non-existent). Another typical web resource (out of date!). Maybe they lost their "Care and Feeding" advocate and now no one wants to be; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00351.html (8,141 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Eimac (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:11:41 -0500; posted Seems everything is done with one of their "forms". My data sheet request was a form: http://www.eimac.com/reqform.htm Care and Feeding comments: http://www.eimac.com/comment.htm Mike N2MG --; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00350.html (7,503 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Eimac (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 11:50:37 -0500; I just received (Monday) a real datasheet (10 pages) for a 3CX800 triode. I went to Eimac's web site last Thursday and requested it. I'd call that fast. (Not sure why they don't have them posted yet; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00344.html (6,949 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Reduction Drive (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:20:09 -0500; I'm trying to "restore" a pair of ARD230A amps. RF decks and PS seem OK. They both make power. The few identified problems seem to be in the control crap. Go figure. Amongst these problems, I found t; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00329.html (7,894 bytes)
11. SV: SV: [AMPS] Re: SB220 problem (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 08:40:07 -0500; On Thursday, November 11, 1999 12:26 AM, measures [SMTP:measures@vcnet.com] wrote: the Rich, he meant that the bandswitch's knob should be DIFFERENT. You sure as hell don't tune that for maximum RF o; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00282.html (8,446 bytes)
12. [AMPS] SB-200 Warc Mods (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 14:14:30 -0400; For reflector archives, use the new search tool on http://www.eham.net called eHamDetective. 73 Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00532.html (6,862 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Thanks, Dan. (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 08:11:05 -0400; and S impressive. Same "amount of illegality"? A thinking person (yes, even a lawyer too) could debate just the concept. Unless of course there's petit and grand excess. CBers amplifiers Hmm... true; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00489.html (8,378 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Re: Our CB Brethren! (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 07:41:16 -0400; A little like the "normal" use of the nitro motors they use to generate the power in the first place! Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00488.html (8,733 bytes)
15. [AMPS] COAX (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:08:52 -0400; amp a At least while you're mobile ;) Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: o; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00450.html (7,141 bytes)
16. [AMPS] amplifier problems (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 12:36:46 -0400; down replace to13w. coated application. It sure gets crowded on a head of a pin. He has a 20W unit, apparently in hand. Why would you feel it necessary to tell him a 10W would work and not answer his; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00429.html (10,138 bytes)
17. [AMPS] amplifier problems (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:28:44 -0400; replace it 13w. Your point? That's not what he asked. A 20W, if it fits physically, will be OK. True enough, but since a 10W "should probably" maybe it "might not". 73 Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http:/; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00427.html (8,693 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:16:11 -0400; Yup, more misinformation. Should be 1/4-wave from the peak to the minimum (1/2-wave between peaks). Mea culpa. Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00409.html (7,243 bytes)
19. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:35:40 -0400; Not sure I understand, Jon. If we're looking at a standing wave, by definition the voltage at a specific point on the line never changes. We slide the detector probe along the line until we find a pe; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00406.html (7,574 bytes)
20. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:47:36 -0400; ago, transmission Guy two responds: One guy talks about the VSWR being the same along the slotted line. The other guy, in apparent disagreement, says the VOLTAGE varies with position. And there's a P; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00401.html (7,528 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]