Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5yr@att.net: 397 ]

Total 397 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] v1369 ?? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:10:50 -0600
Sorry, folks, the REPLY ALL "feature" caught me again . . . obviously, my questions for Carl were intended to be private. 73, George W5YR w5yr@att.net you don't Initial the like _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00534.html (11,506 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] v1369 ?? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:58:11 -0600
Carl, out of curiosity, why doesn't TT just disable the Sweep function, remove it from the list of features and specs and avoid all the grief it seems to cause. Is it really good enough to be worth t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00531.html (10,343 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:15:38 -0600
Yeah, Gary - my Momma used to say "never say anything you wouldn't want repeated in church!" Still, it is a pretty sneaky trick to play, Mr. "RM". Since my name is already mud on this reflector, I gu
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00590.html (9,766 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] FW: [Icom] RE: Icom Japan IC-7800 announcement (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:57:35 -0600
The following has been cross-posted to this reflector by "RM" (kamar@inr.net) without my permission. These remarks were intended for the Icom reflector only. They represent my opinion which I was not
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00587.html (13,469 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Simple Answer - Why and how is Orion better? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:25:28 -0600
Sure was, Bill, and I appreciate it! George response advance to course, _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00462.html (10,558 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion in contests (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:04:24 -0600
Rob, I and many others like me have been reading the reflector and observing the ORION scene for well over a year now. We have yet to find the type and level of information that you and your friend s
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00453.html (14,841 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion / Mikes / W4NJF (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:15:01 -0600
Perhaps a more appropriate question is how many of the major contesters and big multi-multi stations use Ten Tec equipment? John, ON4UN, uses an ORION as we know, but what others? I don't know and am
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00363.html (8,485 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:16:33 -0600
Grant, as usual, we largely agree on this. My notion is that the ORION should not be promoted as a software-defined radio with all that implies without providing some indication of its software-defin
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00183.html (13,393 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] audio (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:07:26 -0600
One would expect that, as a software-defined radio, the functions of the ORION ACCY pins would be determined by the control program. In that way, given the proper menu provisions, the operator could
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00180.html (10,373 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] SSB Bandwidth, readability, power, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 07:23:08 -0600
In addition to the question of how one would measure this operation, it is also true that the signal power is not uniformly distributed within whichever bandwidth is chosen. The lower frequencies req
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00109.html (9,443 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Re: what is so special about heil microphone elements? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:39:16 -0600
An added effect of impedance mismatching has to do not so much with "power" transfer with mics but with frequency response. The classic D-104 - which I used for many years and still have - sounded gr
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00874.html (9,635 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:08:50 -0500
<skip> Not a thing, Bill, other than the fact that some folks confuse the physical size and length of a wire antenna with its capture area, which relates to gain and not to size.. Using that erroneou
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00658.html (8,602 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:02:52 -0500
Billy, anyone not looking for a trolling contest would implicitly understand that the stated comparison between the two antenna lengths obviously applies only to both antennas being located in the sa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00657.html (8,152 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:44:39 -0500
Thank you, Billy, but I already have several ARRL Antenna Books plus a fairly extensive library in this area, including all the texts from undergrad and grad school. And I have read them. And underst
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00643.html (12,560 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:36:22 -0500
We're reading more and more of this sort of thing these days, Stuart. Like you, I just can't sit and let such misinformation stand. Two many newbies look to postings on these reflectors for their inf
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00616.html (10,856 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Re: Rudimentary SWR question... (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:48:18 -0500
Interesting . . . I use my 88 ft 20-meter EDZ on 75 SSB and most stations say it is equal to or exceeds the signal from my resonant 80-meter full-wave horizontal loop. The first time I used it on 75
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00613.html (14,903 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Sale (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:22:47 -0500
Perhaps it will help if we all keep in mind that in setting the 30-day return policy, Ten Tec management anticipated a certain percentage of returns and adjusted the sale price to accommodate that ex
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00515.html (9,179 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] bigger problem with update (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:00:59 -0500
Jack, what has the factory advised you to do? Surely they have a solution to this sort of problem . . . 73/72, George Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00435.html (9,274 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Orion SSB Challenge: why no Orions heard? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:22:45 -0500
"rig". Not at all, Bill, although I don't know what rig you bought. I think that the major reason people end up with the "wrong" rig on their desk is simply that they lack correct and appropriate inf
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00431.html (11,784 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Orion SSB Challenge: why no Orions heard? (score: 1)
Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:06:49 -0500
Exactly - just like the owners of all other brands. It is human nature to defend one's actions, especially when it involves spending a lot of money. Applies to cars, radios, houses, etc. ____________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00423.html (10,029 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

This search system is powered by Namazu