Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Mount\s+pi\-net\s+capacitors\s+vertically\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Mount\s+pi\-net\s+capacitors\s+vertically\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: jeff@wa1hco.mv.com (jeff millar); Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 00:32:08 -0400; I went to the site mentioned a few days ago with all the amp pictures, http://www.angenent.org/W7IUV/amp-pix.htm and noted that most of these put the vacuum variables horizontal with the tuning shaft; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00746.html (8,706 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:04:06 -0700; ? Builders who use horiz. mounting apparently did not read the Jennings catalog. ? Semi-excellent. Four 8877s are way more expensive than one 8171. They require twice as much drive and they do not h; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00751.html (9,155 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 06:45:54 -0400; Mounting Position- Units may be mounted in any position. When large capacitors are mounted horizontally, both ends should be supported to prevent excessive stresses (vertical mounting preferred). You; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00757.html (9,323 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: K0FF@ARRL.NET (K0FF); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:26:28 -0500; Bertha used two ceramic vacuums, stood on end with the silver plated coil between them (she's a mono bander). The caps were driven with right angle drives and turns counters. That's why the turns cou; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00761.html (11,472 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:47:23 +0200; In a frequency where the box ground path could be noticeable the large HF vaacum capacitor would be already out of matter because of their stray inductance. Practically speaking, the output circuits; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00763.html (10,468 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: da_kang@hotmail.com (Jeff Wolf); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 14:21:37 GMT; Nice plate load impedance, too :) --Toll Free _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Shar; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00765.html (8,382 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:27:55 EDT; Not to start a long thread about this but.... Which Jennings catalog? My 1980 edition, which covers all the vacuum caps I've used, specifies ANY mounting position. 73, Marv WC6W * ___________________; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00766.html (8,499 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:27:55 EDT; On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 00:32:08 -0400 "jeff millar" <jeff@wa1hco.mv.com> writes: put I'd I didn't do it. My caps are mounted as close as practical to the tube socket (cathode return)! Though, I went hor; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00767.html (7,972 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:48:18 -0400; As does mine Marv, my catalog says "any position". The only warning is to support big capacitors at both ends. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Subm; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00768.html (8,543 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:05:01 -0700; ... not an example of good reading skills, Tom. Jennings essentially says to use end supports with large units if one chooses horizontal mounting. Another consideration is the constant stress of gra; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00775.html (10,112 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:12:20 -0700; True, and it says "vertical mounting preferred". , later, Marv - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00778.html (8,364 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:38:57 +0100; After getting the comments from Rich about this, I've gone over to vertical mounting, and found (fortuitously?) that I end up with far more sanitary layouts and easier mechanics. However, I am motor; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00838.html (9,044 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 08:44:55 -0400; I use a sub-front panel and mount the capacitors directly to it. The input and control circuits go between the sub-front and the front. That way I can work on the input or control/bias/metering circ; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00839.html (9,224 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Mount pi-net capacitors vertically (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:50:27 +0100; As they say, there's more ways than one of skinning a cat.....I think that especially if motor driving, vertical mount can (not necessarily has) have advantages. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00840.html (8,193 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]