Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\'Good\s+engineering\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\'Good\s+engineering\'\s*$/: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:18:37 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Should I go into my log and delete the 10,000 or so QSO's I have made with my Chinese 8877 and do it again with a "real" tube? 73, Bill W6WRT Chinese "real" tube #2, would ha; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00604.html (7,191 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:30:45 -0700; I'm sure glad I have a delete key. And a spam box. Oh... And by the way Jim (VE7RF).... The legal, moral, fair, and gentlemanly allowable power output here in the US is 1500 watts. 73 Jim W7RY ______; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00612.html (8,747 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:39:03 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I'm already running 1500 watts. More db = less license. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00615.html (7,543 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:45:45 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: At the rate it's going I'll probably throw away my 8877 in another 50 years, so I'll be keeping that in mind. I'll be about 120. It's "floozy" grid is at about 10% of it's ma; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00616.html (7,776 bytes)
5. [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:01:34 -0700; I'm sure glad I have a delete key. And a spam box. Oh... And by the way Jim (VE7RF).... The legal, moral, fair, and gentlemanly allowable power output here in the US is 1500 watts. 73 Jim W7RY for th; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00635.html (9,264 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:17:09 -0400; I'd agree with the legal aspect here in the US, BUT... when it comes to the pileups, which is more fair, moral?, and gentlemanly? One quick call with a strong clean signal followed by a 15 to 20 seco; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00650.html (12,546 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:36:26 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Jim has been a scofflaw forever, at least for the couple of years I have been reading his illegal-amp drivel on various reflectors. He always points to bad behavior by others; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00651.html (8,524 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:56:20 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: The answer is obvious. Shame on you, Roger. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00660.html (7,739 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:50:34 +0800; Bill. Shame on you sir. I can't believe a technically minded person could ever say such a thing. You should be saying the exact opposite. We need a hundred more Jims in all fields of our hobby. We ne; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00672.html (10,272 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:35:50 -0400; Canada has adopted a very progressive sets of rules for amateur-class service, particularly with respect to output power, occupied bandwidth, and license classes. If Canadian amateurs wish to fully e; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00675.html (9,056 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Dwayne" <863@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:57:46 -0700; Dwayne Ve6qx _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00676.html (10,125 bytes)
12. [Amps] 'good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:47:57 -0700; REPLY: Jim has been a scofflaw forever, at least for the couple of years I have been reading his illegal-amp drivel on various reflectors. you have built 5 x amps.. why not post the pix on ham_amps..; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00679.html (12,857 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:46:01 -0500; "...They are much safer because of eccentrics like Jim wanted to push the envelope and go one better..." ** Hi Alek, This observation is off-topic, surely, but it sorta ties-in with what you're sayin; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00681.html (9,574 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] 'good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:20:38 -0700; Wow - touched a nerve on that one, didn't I? Any legally-operating ham would just say "Nonsense, I always operate legally" or words to that effect. I see nothing remotely like that in your drivel bel; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00684.html (11,882 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] 'good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:24:37 -0400; Children, children! - Jim W4ENE _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00685.html (8,111 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] 'good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:31:45 -0400; Bill, Nice looking amp. Are those Simpson panel meters on the RF unit? Also, I see a pair of yellow "tip" test jacks on the front panel. Are those used for filament V monitoring? Paul, W9AC _________; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00686.html (7,915 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] 'good engineering' (score: 1): Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:10:41 -0700; Oh please... Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00687.html (15,005 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] 'good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:26:52 -0700; &&& "nonsense, I always operate legally" Are you happy now ? && Nice amp Bill. Are you sure it only runs the legal limit ? How many 8877's are inside? If that 4:1 balun on your X-7 ever gives you trb; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00688.html (14,086 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] 'Good engineering' (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:31:18 -0500; I oft-times wonder what in the world it Or the guy who saw an egg drop out of a chicken. Don WA4NPL _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00689.html (8,829 bytes)
20. Re: [Amps] 'good engineering' (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:47:59 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Thanks for the nice words, Paul. Yes all three meters are Simpsons, the one on the power supply is a different model, one I had for years. The two on the amp were purchased j; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00692.html (9,349 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]