Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CX1500A\s+vs\s+el\s+cheapo\s+GS\-35B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CX1500A\s+vs\s+el\s+cheapo\s+GS\-35B\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: Robert Briggs <vk3zl@bigpond.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:38:08 +1000; Oh boy, what a bunch of grizzlers...I am having a real chuckle at some of the garbage being spouted here regarding the GS-35B tube...We are talking about a reasonably cheap to buy tube that amateurs; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00473.html (8,878 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:53:38 -0700; REPLY: Shucks, we can't all attend the Cowboy School of Amplifier Design. :-) Some of us actually read the specs and a book or two and THINK about what we're doing. 73, Bill W6WRT ___________________; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00475.html (6,883 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:44:52 -0500; How 'bout them Olympics ? Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00478.html (6,898 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:21:55 -0400; ** So much for the typical Aussie anti-American noise. Im glad you cleared that air early on. There are many excellent tubes from Europe and recently from China that produce good to excellent IMD sig; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00001.html (12,468 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:51:59 -0700; REPLY: I wonder why the MRI manufacturers don't put in a circuit that detects a fall-off in performance rather than a time-based pull schedule? Oh wait, I know. It's all paid for by insurance or the; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00006.html (7,483 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:18:45 -0500; I for one. My Homebrewed pair of 4-400's amp has been in steady service since i built it in 1979. My Clipperton-L (4x572) has been in service since 1980. Nothing bad about "OLD". After all I started; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00007.html (7,560 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:04:35 -0700; money just because someone else is paying the bill. Its purpose is to save big money. Think about it. At $2000 a study, 3 per hour (or more) and an average 12 hour working day = $72,000 per day gross; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00010.html (9,093 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:36:11 -0400; I run an ATC (USN ART-13 predecessor) on 17M AM, it just makes it with the PTO but tunes/loads fine. It was either add AM to the mix several years ago or get into the digital crap as chasing DX was g; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00016.html (8,969 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:15:59 -0500; That's not how it works Bill. This is a medical device we're talking about and it's use and repair is regulated by the FDA and maybe state law.. Not something "anyone" could swap out. I'm not intimat; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00022.html (9,939 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:59:00 -0700; I don't want to belabor this thread any longer, but what you say below is exactly what's wrong with medical industry in America. When money flows like water, nobody is thinking about cost reduction a; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00026.html (9,413 bytes)
11. [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: Robert Briggs <vk3zl@bigpond.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:16:03 +1000; (Quote) "" Most wouldn't recognize second rate if it bit them on the a** and could care less what their signals sounded like"" .. Your Honor and members of the jury, we the council for the defense, r; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00034.html (8,169 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 03:50:59 -0400 (EDT); (Quote) "" Most wouldn't recognize second rate if it bit them on the a** and could care less what their signals sounded like"" .. Your Honor and members of the jury, we the council for the defense, r; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00035.html (8,400 bytes)
13. [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 02:07:10 -0700; money just because someone else is paying the bill. Its purpose is to save big money. Think about it. At $2000 a study, 3 per hour (or more) and an average 12 hour working day = $72,000 per day gross; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00037.html (13,275 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:31:30 +0800; I just know him as a nice old fart who has built heaps and heaps of amplifiers to a standard and finish that the rest of can only dream about. Seriously, If you wanna get an amplifier built, send the; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00038.html (10,415 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 06:47:12 -0400 (EDT); Alek, I just might be one of the few lucky ones on here that know all about the beautiful work that Bob does! I've seen many of his entries in the contests he has won. I often tell Bob it must be a l; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00039.html (11,199 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 06:56:58 -0500; "So let it be written.So let it be done." Dpn W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00040.html (9,070 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:59:40 +0800; Can someone post a link or two to the fabled work of Bob? I would like to take a look. Lot of examples of marginal to poor work on the web. The great stuff is harder to find. Thanks! 73/jeff/ac0c www; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00041.html (9,874 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:41:32 -0400; While you can put lipstick on Miss Piggy she is still a pig and even a Georgia lawyer cant deny that. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00043.html (9,442 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 06:05:27 -0700; "While you can put lipstick on Miss Piggy she is still a pig and even a Georgia lawyer cant deny that." Well, sir, as a lawyer, I can tell you that is often the goal of a good (or bad ) lawyer - conv; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00045.html (9,459 bytes)
20. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:06:34 -0400 (EDT); But the jury might be more sympathetic to a really good looking pig! 73, Gerald K5GW In a message dated 8/2/2012 7:41:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time, km1h@jeremy.mv.com writes: While you can put lipst; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00046.html (9,360 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]