Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Counting\s+uniques\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Counting\s+uniques\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 04:53:35 +0700; If my contest uniques got taken out, I could lose 1/3 of my contacts and assume is true with other DX stations. The FACT is that I get unique calls from ops who want to work Thailand and then do not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00008.html (7,673 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:39:16 +0300; Charly .. You got me very interested in your email. Can you please review your CQWW 2013 SSB log checking report for your uniques and tell the people on the email list if you really have 30% of your; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00010.html (9,116 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Embry <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:08:44 -0400; Charly, It would be interesting to see what your LCR(s) says to verify your claims. 73, Jeff K3OQ -- Jeff Embry, K3OQ FM19oc ARCI #11643, FPQRP #-696, QRP-L # 67, NAQCC #25, ARS #1733 AMSAT LM-2263 -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00011.html (9,154 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:12:06 -0400; The facts are that the HS0ZCW log in 2013 worked 679 QSOs and logged 4 uniques (0.6%). The E2E log from that same year had 1546 QSOs and logged 39 uniques or 2.5%. So, what's the issue here? There ar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00012.html (10,574 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:16:35 -0400; Uniques are counted in the CQ & ARRL contests. Is there a proposal to change this? What exactly is this discussion about? 73, Dave K3ZJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00013.html (10,003 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 09:47:10 -0500; I think you are overestimating the number of uniques that are worked during a contest. In CQ WW SSB 2014, your multi-single entry as E2E had 2432 QSOs after log checking. Of those, 17 were uniques. (; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00014.html (9,947 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:53:34 +0200; Charles, American bosses of American contests show little understanding nor care for the DX entries. Interesting viewpoint taking into account they just asked YOU for YOUR opinion on the topic of uni; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00015.html (7,785 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:04:43 -0700; I believe that uniques should count, and have witnessed over the decades - very much depending upon from where I'm operating - the rarer, the more real uniques. QUESTION: SU1AH needed me for a new DX; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00016.html (9,600 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: VE5ZX <ve5zx@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:20:15 -0600; WOW - I second the contents of Jim's posting in particular the comments about SO and SOA. It is time to accept that SOA will be here for a very long time. Let's get on with acknowledging it as common; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00017.html (10,690 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:07:46 -0300; submitting their logs as "Assisted"? That results in the vast majority of the CQWW CC having to devote countless hours to find and prove their procedures, and despite that, there are cheating cases; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00020.html (12,945 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>; Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:02:43 -0400; Randy, What amazes me is that this same discussion was held almost 20 years ago - almost word for word. It was a big deal when K1EA started CT and the unique discussion dominated every DX/Contesting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00021.html (11,180 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 10:19:31 +0200; Contesting is about FUN !! Oh wait..I elaborated about that already on may 25th... Anyway, let me offer a suggestion here: "Remove any incentive , reward, etc. from the SO class" Since the SOA class; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00025.html (12,522 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: "Peter Chamalian W1RM" <w1rm@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 09:08:59 -0400; Back in the day, uniques were treated with a special consideration. If the call was indeed a valid call and the owner showed up in the callbook, QRZ or other national directory, a request for a log e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00038.html (10,100 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 12:36:33 -0400; I guess that depends how much time the sponsors have to run them down. In addition to checking whether Unassisted types are cheating. And who has bad signals and should be DQed. Same for power cheate; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00040.html (8,965 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:06:12 -0500; I just worked 9K9Z in the AA test to fill a band/mode slot. Hope he doesn't get demoted, as he's the only station I worked in that contest. dit dit de HB I guess that depends how much time the sponso; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00044.html (9,613 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: "Paolo, IK3QAR" <ik3qar@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 07:56:38 +0200; Hope he doesn't get demoted, as he's the only station I worked in that contest. Hans, this *may* happen only if you don't submit the log to the committee. Otherwise no. 73 Paolo IK3QAR ______________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00049.html (8,688 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: John Dorr via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 09:12:33 -0400; All, As is often said on this channel, "calm down." No one is advocating that all uniques be removed from logs and be classified as bad calls. Of course there are examples such as Hans' QSO and other; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00053.html (11,342 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:36:18 -0400; Something that occurs to me is that the algorithm CT1BOH developed for use in ARCluster V6 to pick upbusted calls in RBN output might be adapted totest the premise that most uniques are busts. It del; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00055.html (11,885 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 16:14:50 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Uniques were found to be busts, real uniques, or unverified QSOs in checking logs for the CQ 160 Contests. On 160 there are few acual uniques as most stations found once they could make a contact the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00056.html (11,027 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 19:43:30 -0400; This subject came up as a result of the CQWW Survey. Question 10 states: "A unique callsign is one that is reported only by one station. Most unique calls are copying errors. Should all QSOs with uni; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00057.html (9,285 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]