Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+down\s+the\s+path\s+with\s+Dave\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 08:42:46 +0700
Dave, any time a trend gets a name, like Luddite, that name substitutes for thinking (like a name for a racial type of person). Further, it is typical of rigid personalities to reject reasoned critic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00008.html (17,779 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:27:26 -0500
Charly, the only thing that Skimmer replaces is the physical act of tuning the radio. An operator still must copy the CW,. verify that he is copying the station spotted (instead of the one adjacent t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00014.html (18,618 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Radio Station K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:52:50 -0700
Pete, that's like saying that a fishing guide only rows the boat. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00019.html (22,597 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:05:06 -0500
Tom, I think maybe you misunderstood where I'm coming from. Unlike Joe, W4TV, I believe that using Skimmer is just like using a cluster, only more powerful. I have never argued for Skimmer use *not*
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00020.html (10,881 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:38:03 +1100
Charly, the only thing that Skimmer replaces is the physical act of tuning the radio. Wrong - Skimmer replaces the acquired personal skill of finding stations by tuning, listening and decoding. Thos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00021.html (8,407 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:29:59 -0500
Charly, the only thing that Skimmer replaces is the physical act of tuning the radio. For me, the objectionable part of skimmer is the removal or lessening of operator skill. I equate it to using a c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00024.html (9,802 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 09:52:50 -0600
It seems to me most of the points made by the big gun stations are made by running stations. Correct me if I'm wrong. Skimmer is useless when running stations. Packet is useless when running stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00025.html (23,492 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:41:17 -0700
Pete, You're trying to actually reason with Charles and that isn't going to get you very far. Just look at the criticism he makes in his first paragraph below ... the part about people rejecting reas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00026.html (13,471 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:05:49 -0500
Tom, I think maybe you misunderstood where I'm coming from. Unlike Joe, W4TV, I believe that using Skimmer is just like using a cluster, only more powerful. I have never argued for Skimmer use *not*
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00027.html (9,920 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:32:16 -0700
Using skimmer requires a completely different tool set to use it effectively. How much skill does it really take to turn a knob? Mike W0MU On 12/2/2012 10:05 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: Tom, I think m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00028.html (11,668 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:37:04 -0700
Tom, While I've never used CW Skimmer to decode callsigns or text in a contest, I have played around with it in that mode (local) and in general I don't find it to be as accurate as the spots I can g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00029.html (11,980 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Charly, the only thing that Skimmer replaces is the physical act of tuning the radio. An operator still must copy the CW,. verify that he is copying the station spotted (instead of the one adjacent t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00032.html (9,567 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 09:10:53 -0500
Actually taking full advantage of skimmer or RBN or manually-posted spots is something that I think very very few have mastered. Up until the past year or two, the "assisted" category of most contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00039.html (10,488 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] down the path with Dave (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:39:14 -0500
You need to read my comment in context, Yuri - I was replying to Charly's assertion that using one's own Skimmer removes all the skill from contesting. Of course, a running station benefits when anyo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00040.html (9,353 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu