Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+200mW\s+cards\s+in\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+200mW\s+cards\s+in\s+question\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 01:18:37 -0400; Gentlemen I have a question for the people that have purchased the so called 200mW cards with the FCC ID SL-2511CD-plus2, which I think is almost everyone testing show about 56mW or 17dBm of output f; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00255.html (8,785 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 08:15:58 -0400; Interesting results, Was it just that card or all of the supposed 200mw cards? Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com 781-658-2075 www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com Gentlemen; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00257.html (10,219 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Scott Stevens <scott@scottstevens.net>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 08:24:44 -0600; Not as per Karlnet. Proposition of 17dbm. What are you testing with? -- Scott Stevens 800-815-4682 scott@scottstevens.net orders@scottstevens.net support@scottstevens.net "Near cost Fridays! Oh, and; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00258.html (8,430 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 10:29:56 -0400; Scott, Are you saying you see 17db with these cards as well? Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com 781-658-2075 www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com Not as per Karlnet. Proposit; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00259.html (9,560 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 10:52:49 -0400; Who is the actual manufacturer of these 100mW and so-called 200mW PrismII cards? Not where you got it or what the label says.....:-) Who MAKES them? At 10:29 AM 5/22/02, you wrote: Scott, Are you say; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00261.html (9,606 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Dimitrios Sidiropoulos" <iron@vernet.gr>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:16:20 +0300; Roger, The manufacturer is Senao. They recently finished the FCC certs for the 200mw cards. FCCid # : NI3-SL-2011CD-PLUS (E) for the 100mw NI3-SL-2511CD-PLUS (E) for the 200mw Dimitri d.html Roger Bo; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00262.html (10,285 bytes)
7. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:22:00 -0400; Thank you, Dimitri. At 11:16 AM 5/22/02, you wrote: Roger, The manufacturer is Senao. They recently finished the FCC certs for the 200mw cards. FCCid # : NI3-SL-2011CD-PLUS (E) for the 100mw NI3-SL-2; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00263.html (8,964 bytes)
8. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:53:00 -0400; Scott We tested on channel one with a know good connector and card, using a HP analyzer for testing. Using the Prism test util we put the card in constant transmit mode. I will tell you this we have; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00269.html (9,595 bytes)
9. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 16:18:34 -0400; FYI Just go off the phone with Karlnet test lab and to date they have not tested the our cards for RF output, this is from they only two people that would have done it. Please specify your source of; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00270.html (9,993 bytes)
10. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:37:20 -0500; Don't want to jump in here, but Reggie @ KarlNet actually mentioned to me that the Senoa cards (the ones you sent), we a little weak on output -Charles FYI Just go off the phone with Karlnet test lab; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00273.html (10,670 bytes)
11. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 17:49:02 -0400; Hmm interesting as this is one of the people we talked to :) And they have not tested the cards using an analyzers yet. When we tested the card to get the max output, we test the cable for loss then; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00274.html (11,825 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Scott Stevens <scott@scottstevens.net>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:50:55 -0600; So who's pigs do you suggest? -- Scott Stevens 800-815-4682 scott@scottstevens.net orders@scottstevens.net support@scottstevens.net "Always on E-Mail and 24/7 Support"; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00275.html (8,771 bytes)
13. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 22:09:54 -0400; Scott We are using connectors from Amphenol with Semi-ridge cable, we make and test them in house. This allows for a very strong solder connection so there is no movement on the internal solder conne; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00279.html (9,835 bytes)
14. Re: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Scott Stevens <scott@scottstevens.net>; Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 08:17:41 -0600; Amphenol, ah yes, the connex connectors. Shrouds pop off (at Least on the MC Card lucent) I have tons of different types of pigs at many different pricing. Named the most durable and stable build on; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00284.html (9,135 bytes)
15. RE: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:55:02 -0400; Hmm this would be because the MC-Card is a poor connector design :) MMCX on the other hand is not to bad for a mini connector. Correct me if I am wrong but EC gets there pigs from RFI which, we have; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00289.html (10,297 bytes)
16. Re: [Karlnet] 200mW cards in question (score: 1): Author: Scott Stevens <scott@scottstevens.net>; Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:29:25 -0600; Be it that the connector combination is not the best in the world but it won't be changed overnight, I've thought TNC for quite some time as an acceptable connector to use in most situations. -- Scot; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00290.html (9,360 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]