All: Dayton seems to be a good place to inform hams about solar panel RFI and it's potential for wide-spread interference. With 400 cases and counting handled by the ARRL and FCC regulations that car
I've got two local houses that appear to be potentially causing interference. But recently (last week) I am getting constant wide band noise on all HF bands. 10 dB increase on 40, 13 dB increase on 1
Hi Tony, Please be sure to coordinate this with the ARRL first! They may be working with vendors, and if this is done in a vacuum, (from the ARRL), it could easily cause bad feelings, or worse break
Dave: Absolutely. The ARRL is our ONLY advocate and it's a shame they have to walk on eggshells begging for cooperation from Big Solar. I don't blame the FCC for that - I blame hams for not taking ac
Hi Tony, I am happy to see we agree any petition needs to be coordinated with the ARRL! To be truly effective the ARRL has to follow a process, and that process can be complex and difficult at times.
Again: This "ARRL FIRST" needs to be widely distributed among the ham community. Without that, only those who subscribe to this small group are aware. Dave - WØLEV -- *Dave - WØLEV* *Just Let Darwin
Hi Tony, You said I might be off base here, but I don't see any downside to petitioning the FCC to rethink emissions limits to benefit hams. I would hate to see the harmful interference limitation re
I would love to see a What to do about RFI type slide deck that can be passed around to clubs and presented. It would cover identifying and characterizing RFI, direction finding, and how to loop ARRL
https://www.nk7z.net/sdr-rfi-survey-p1/ Also see the Presentations available there. 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI ARRL Asst.
You said I might be off base here, but I don't see any downside to petitioning the FCC to rethink emissions limits to benefit hams. I would hate to see the harmful interference limitation removed fro
The structure of our government, how it works, and how it is driven by big money. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contest
Kurt, Respectfully, (and to keep the record correct here), your comments about the FCC being, "out of touch", "deranged", "vindictive", and "destructive", are only your interpretation of some well th
From the recent forum thread: I might be off base here, but I don't see any downside to petitioning the FCC to rethink emissions limits to benefit hams. A response: "I would hate to see the harmful i
Dave: We can buy a lot of leverage in Washington with 700,00 hams donating annually to the ARRL Spectrum Defense Fund. That's $14,000,000 annually with a measly $20 donation from each ham. It's still
Absolutely Tony! This approach would allow the ARRL to take an organized approach to the issue, and help fund that approach as well! That is how I would like to see it done! 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7
I'm not going to take a side in this discussion but allow me to point out that there are 776,142 FCC licensees as of yesterday. https://www.arrl.org/fcc-license-counts Of those, fewer than 160,000 ar
On 5/10/22 13:07, KD7JYK DM09 wrote: Personally, I think more groups, from more directions, attempting to address the issue more directly, in more ways, to what Ed posted earlier as being regulations
Well, there's nothing like not understanding, or taking comments out of context, or isolating small portions, changing the meaning, or intent, then reacting to that... again... I'd break it down, but
Kurt, It has been a pleasure discussing this with you...Thanks for your time in this. 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI ARRL Asst