Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Sound\s+card\s+for\s+RTTY\/MMTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Sound\s+card\s+for\s+RTTY\/MMTTY\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Dennis <egan.dennis88@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:47:16 -0500; Having recently upgraded from Win XP to Win 7, the Santa Cruz sound card that I've used for several years is no longer usable (no Win7 drivers, and the XP drivers won't work). So, I'm in the market f; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00249.html (6,431 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:55:32 -0600; Dennis: Depending on how old the computer is, most have on-board sound chips that obviates the need for a separate sound card. Also depending on the age of your computer, if you require a separate so; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00251.html (8,374 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:02:07 -0800 (PST); I recently purchased one of these for my laptop: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829128010&cm_re=usb_sound_card-_-29-128-010-_-Product It seems to work well although its not tot; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00252.html (7,808 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:34:53 -0500; For USB sound cards these two have separate mic and line inputs and seem to work well with WriteLog and N1MM Logger: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829126101 http://www.newegg.; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00253.html (9,855 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:18:14 -0700; Both of those USB sound devices look interesting. I wonder if either has a "mic boost" to enable use with dynamic mics (e.g. Heil)? Neither product mentions Windows 7 compatibility, but I guess they; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00254.html (8,651 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "KE1JF-Tom" <ke1jf@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:53:25 -0500; Windows 7 has a mic. boost under recording devices, properties then select Levels. There you can vary the Db of Mic. Boost separate from the Mic. Level, this offers more control than XP which only ha; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00255.html (9,343 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:37:50 -0800; Dennis, W1UE, asked: I just purchased three ThinkPads with Windows 7 Professional and got the GWC 5.1 channel audio adapter for each. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829126101); /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00256.html (7,965 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:46:21 -0700; According to NewEgg: SIIG IC-510012-S2 : Signal/Noise ratio = 68.5 dB SIIG IC-710012-S2 : Signal/Noise ratio = 92.0 dB How relevant are those S/N ratios for for RTTY?; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00577.html (7,281 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:29:06 -0500; I'm sure Chen will weigh in on this subject but my short answer is "not very." Either one should provide all the performance the average amateur will need. In most cases the audio level from the tra; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00578.html (8,820 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:32:13 -0800; It depends. If you are using narrow I.F. filters, the answer is probably that you will see no difference whatsoever. If you use a good rig and wideband (waterfall) modes, then you will see some diffe; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00579.html (8,070 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:17:35 -0800; For comparison, the HAL ST-8000, arguably the very best hardware modem known to have been manufactured, has a dynamic range of only 80 to 85 dB even when you include its analog AGC stage. Before they; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00580.html (7,738 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:43:44 -0500; Irv Hoff's ST-6 (circa 1971) was no slouch either, as I recall. Maybe even it's ST-6000 descendant by HAL. I will never forget watching my old model 15 print readable text using my homebrew copy of t; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00581.html (8,275 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:11:37 -0800; An plain ol ST-8000. Not the A version that you frequently see on EBay. 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00582.html (9,237 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:40:55 -0800; That is correct. The ST-8000A is just a pretty average DSP RTTY Modem that takes up a full 2-U Rack space. Don't get taken. 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00583.html (7,676 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:03:38 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Or a copy of RiTTY by K6STI. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00591.html (8,447 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Anthony J. Cioffi" <n2ki@amsat.org>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:16:45 +0000; Bill, Too bad riTTY doesn't run on today's systems. I still have my copy. Sent From BlackberryA. J. Cioffi(N2KI)www.n2ki.com --Original Message-- From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> Sender: rt; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00592.html (9,099 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:36:33 -0800; Or both _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00596.html (8,739 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:38:21 -0700; Thanks, all. I'll probably just get the 7.1 card anyway. It sounds like it's probably overkill. I run RTTY on the IC756 Pro III in RTTY mode but WITHOUT the TPF. - Jim; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00604.html (9,092 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:35:38 -0600; I also use the Pro III. Jim, you REALLY do need to push that RTTY FIL ON/OFF button sometimes. You won't believe how it will pull a workable QSO out of (apparently) jumbled up noise! As Don had writt; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00605.html (9,018 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:08 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Yes that is a shame, but old computers are everywhere. The trick is to get the right soundcard - a SoundBlaster 16 ISA, either model CT-1740 or CT-1790. Others might work, bu; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00607.html (9,623 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]