Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CW\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: William Evans <bevans@starband.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:21:35 -0500
It's interesting to read all the threads on this reflector, for I learn so much (probably more than I'll ever need)! But I do ned to ask a basic, retro-question. Since I now have a Corsair (which is
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00189.html (7,648 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: N6HGT@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:48:19 EST
Bill (W4ISH): If you're interested only in keyboard CW, you might consider the Windows Morse Code Program. It connects to the key port of the Omni VI+, or any other xcvr, and forms code characters by
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00190.html (7,081 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: ac5e@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 00:02:34 +0000
Well, MFJ has a couple of keyers that do a pretty good job. I have an MFJ-493 on line at this moment that I could plug the spare keyboard into. And do from time time. Other keyboard keyers I cannot c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00191.html (8,554 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:32:36 -0600
One of the guest ops here, brings his own keyboard for each rig when he operates the CW contests from here. He uses those special "split key arrangement" Microsoft types. We use TR, NA, and Writelog
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00192.html (7,734 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim <jlboockh@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:44:19 -0600
I use my logging program, DXbase. Freeware that does this is CWType, written by UA9OSV. You can read about it at www.dxsoft.com. I haven't used it since it requires a slightly different software inte
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00195.html (8,016 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Michael A. Newell, WB4HUC" <mnewell1@austin.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 21:09:55 -0600
Here's something that looks kind of interesting, and might do what you want. http://k1el.tripod.com/wkinfo.html 73, Mike - WB4HUC Austin, TX _______________________________________________ TenTec mai
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00197.html (9,006 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 20:12:01 -0700
i have several keyboard solutions to CW ...my main operation is thru a KAM Plus controlled by computer, also have LOGic6 which will key the rig thru the parallel port (printer port), also have MixW w
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00198.html (9,150 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: John Pfeifer <jpfeifer@gci.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 19:43:11 -0900
Bill, If you're up to building a simple kit, you might want to check out the K20 CW keyboard, by K1EL. It's very easy to build...took me less than one hour and I'm pretty ham-fisted (pun intended). Y
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00199.html (8,237 bytes)

9. [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: Mykeyw9@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:18:35 EDT
I'm 83 and still cannot head copy more than 15 WPM (although I still try). Just as a matter of curiosity, did your friend who is 85 recently learn to copy at very fast speed or was he able to achieve
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00864.html (6,993 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:32:01 -0400
My 85 year old friend is Ted, K5LGJ, who lives in Shrevesport, La. and I have been talking with him probably 15 years. It seems like he probably picked up QRQ when he was in his sixties. We still chi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00865.html (7,884 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:00:32 -0400
"surgery on both hands" I knew there had to be a down side to 80 wpm QRQ. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, July 26, 200
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00866.html (9,533 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:19:51 -0500
Boy, do I feel like such a wuss. I was so proud to be getting close to solid 50 wpm sending, and I'm still 30 wpm behind. I guess I'm gonna have to start practicing every day again instead of having
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00867.html (11,048 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:33:31 -0500
How in the world does anything transmit 80 wpm? Wasn't the world record only in the 70 wpm range? Just wondering-- Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00868.html (6,817 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:54:35 -0400
Naw...you got that backwards...some years ago he severely burned both hands...the surgery is to remove some 'webs' between his fingers so he CAN type at 80 wpm again!!! Pretty gutsy for someone that
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00870.html (10,619 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:58:41 -0400
Hay Richard, you meet all the requirements. My old friend, Ira/NU2C could make a keyboard sing at 120+ wpm. Ira is a classical concert pianoist! On the other hand, KB8XE is a welder...so go figure!!
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00872.html (12,685 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:13:59 -0400
Well most of the new radios wont do it. Just today I talked to a guy on 20m who has both an Orion and a new IC-7800. I asked him to run it up to 70 wpm but it garbled the characters at that speed, mu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00875.html (9,334 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: john <johnmb@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:35:59 -0400
Thank you for your encouraging words re: QRQ operations. there's something purely magical to me, about being able to copy at that speed (not that I would know mind you!). I have been copying in my he
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00876.html (8,708 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:06:32 -0500
I did look up the world record set by Ted McElroy and it was 72.2 wpm copy. Probably typed on a mill at that time. Now, when one speaks of Morse speeds, I would expect it to be for hand sent and head
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00878.html (7,916 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Donovan" <n5xm@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:59:54 -0500
Tommy, do you guys use keyboards? I'm sending by hand, and when I get above 45 wpm it's all I can do to keep from feeling like I'm going to take off and fly. I can type real fast, real fast, but have
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00880.html (14,546 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:54:01 -0400
Sorry Stuart, but your information is incorrect. I have a copy of the transmission, sent by a Wheatstone tape by the way, that Frank Borsody W2AYN and Harold Taylor checked for accuracy, that McElroy
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00881.html (9,252 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu