Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Lousy\s+eham\s+review\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Lousy\s+eham\s+review\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <jrippey@3n.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 19:21:42 -0700; I just read a review on eHam.net of the Jupiter. The ham gives it a "0" and calls it "junk." No specifics, just "junk." He complains that his first review disappeared from the eHam web site, and I ho; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00040.html (7,047 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:30:41 -0500; There's no value whatsoever. I've never used a Jup, so whether he's right or wrong is beyond me. I think even the bottom of the barrel of eHam readers ignore that kind of garbage. Something or someo; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00043.html (7,548 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: K7wpz@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:25:55 EDT; Hi, John. Just had to comment on the E-ham reviews. It is sort of like sitting in an airport bar. If one listens to all of the conversations around him, it takes great fortitude not to scream and fle; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00044.html (7,400 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Lousy eham review (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:05:13 +0000; I read that one a day or two ago. At the time I thought it probably came from an inexperienced ham. Could be wrong but to me that's the way it looked. I'm not a big jupiter fan but this kind of revie; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00045.html (7,866 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:07:39 -0400; While I don't know if in this case the following is neccesarily true, always remember: There will always be those who will go out of their way to knock someone else's product. In some cases, they can; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00046.html (8,991 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eham review (score: 1): Author: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:12:42 -0400; Occasionally, one happens to buy a radio that is just a little smarter than the buyer. Phil VFO Stabilizers and PEP adapters for wattmeters...Check out http://home.comcast.net/~k4dpk -- Original Mess; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00047.html (8,663 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:25:31 -0500; Even in macrame done in private for home use, there will eventually appear a critic who will disagree with your choices of material, colors, knots, design, and will consider your workmanship unworthy; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00051.html (9,602 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "steve moore" <hondo1@kitusa.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:45:18 -0500; Maybe the guy just didn't want to list all the faults ? According to his look up on eham the guy has been a ham for 20 years. He holds an extra class license, owns several radios, enjoys antenna buil; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00052.html (10,423 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 00:11:39 -0400; I was just forwarded an email from the poster of the Lousy eHam Review describing his experience with the Jupiter and Ten Tec. He seemed to have some very real issues with the Jupiter including RF pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00053.html (12,444 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Reed O. Krenn" <reed_ww3a@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 07:40:13 -0400; Who are you, and what have you done with WN3VAW??? :-) Congratulations on the new call! -- Reed O. Krenn reed_ww3a@alltel.net "You will be reincarnated as a toad -and you will be much happier" ______; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00056.html (7,916 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 07:49:10 -0500; I'm almost certain, given Toby's information, that this is the same individual who not long ago recommended that someone "do yourself a favor and look at a Yaesu MP MKV" here on the list. I believe h; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00057.html (14,293 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:24:05 -0500; Yes, it is the same guy. He's on a mission. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00058.html (8,550 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:48:31 -0500; One does have to take reviews on eHam with a grain of salt. One 2003 reviewer of the Jup (which definitely seems to be a love it or hate it radio after reading many of the reviews), indicated: "On tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00060.html (8,715 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:06:43 EDT; Or maybe the 746 had its speech processor on or set higher or a different microphone or a louder operator or a different mic gain setting. Reviews like that and "what a great radio/antenna - I worked; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00061.html (8,343 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "Kurt" <wa8vbx@wideopenwest.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:32:37 -0400; I read the comments and the post on eHam about the Lousy Jupiter review, and I have to agree with the guy who said take the reviews with a grain of salt. When I am looking at a new/different radio, I; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00065.html (8,871 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 14:33:21 -0500; I have noticed as of the last few years as tt has come on strong, that the jupe, argo, oriens are not your bubba radios. They are different, sound better, operate better etc.. But IMHO they do requir; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00070.html (10,057 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: "steve moore" <hondo1@kitusa.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 16:01:04 -0500; I'll go along with that. The Jup I had new was just plain dissapointing. I couldn't find anything to like about it. And yes I knew how to operate it. When I called Ten Tec about returning it, they sa; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00073.html (10,089 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:11:33 -0400; Hi, I hope the guy who wrote the review will take my e-mail address and sell me the rig for $100. 73s, Rick --Original Message-- From: John Rippey <jrippey@3n.net> To: tentec@contesting.com Sent: Sat; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00076.html (9,968 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: jmalloy <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:47:03 -0400; I don't know what the problem is (I have my thoughts about it, though) with some people and the Jupiter, but I had one for a few years before trading it in on the Orion and I thought it was a pretty; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00077.html (10,762 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <jrippey@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:23:36 -0700; I appreciate all of the comments. Even though the reviewer may have had some valid issues with the Jupiter, I cannot but feel sorry for any brand-new hams who might stumble across his "review." Total; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00078.html (8,494 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]