Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+LOTW\s+and\s+Rover\s+Ops\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: N3AWS@aol.com
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 06:29:49 EST
How can I get the LOTW to record my grid square when rovering so that others can get credit for the square? I am still struggling with my mobile log from the Florida QSO Party where I activated 16 co
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00006.html (6,554 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: Lee Scott - AA1YN <aa1yn@aa1yn.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 07:14:37 -0500
At 06:29 AM 11/8/2003 -0500, N3AWS@aol.com wrote: How can I get the LOTW to record my grid square when rovering so that others can get credit for the square? I am still struggling with my mobile log
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00007.html (7,784 bytes)

3. RE: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: "Mills, Wayne N7NG" <N7NG@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:48:43 -0500
Jim, Only one certificate is required (or allowed) for each distinct callsign. Grid squares and other data are handled by defining different station locations for each certificate. This is done in th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00008.html (8,126 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: Brian McCarthy <rfacres@akorn.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 11:44:17 -0500
Wayne, I agree. Rovers will need to use the multiple locations feature of TQSL and then the log needs to be broken into separate pieces for each location (grid). It is a bit labor intensive for a rov
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00009.html (9,641 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Carney" <tomc7@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 08:51:16 -0800
I used the technique outlined by Lee (see below) when I set up my rover operations. As long as the other station enters the call as a rover call (KE6FI/6) it works fine. From my experience most but n
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00010.html (8,398 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: "Erich Oetting KI0SK" <ki0sk@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 11:14:03 -0700
During most VHF contests, I sign "Rover" on phone and KI0SK/R on CW. I assume most stations log either one as KI0SK/R and had planned on getting a certificate for KI0SK/R. Does LOTW require signing t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00011.html (9,928 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: Lee Scott - AA1YN <aa1yn@aa1yn.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 15:22:28 -0500
If someone worked the contest as a rover than I logged that person as call/R no mater what mode was used. This is a requirement of the ARRL VHF contests in order to receive credit for working that st
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00012.html (12,052 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 15:43:29 -0500
At 03:22 PM 11/8/03 -0500, Lee Scott - AA1YN wrote: If someone worked the contest as a rover than I logged that person as call/R no mater what mode was used. This is a requirement of the ARRL VHF con
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00013.html (9,647 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW and Rover Ops (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Carney" <tomc7@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:35:56 -0800
Not an expert on LOTW but I believe it will NOT match a log entry for KI0SK/R with a log signed by KI0SK. I also suspect the if you submit a rover log as a /R and someone who you worked submits their
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-11/msg00014.html (8,853 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu