Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+USB\,\s+COM\,\s+LPT\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:57:50 -0500
If the manufacturers of the latest rigs, Yaesu, and TenTec, had included USB or Firewire, would the issue be solved? Are USB or Firewire compatible with rig control/fsk? -- I'm miserable without you,
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00019.html (7,550 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (wa9als)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 08:20:55 -0500
Since USB-to-serial adapters are available, it must be possible for a rig manufacturer to install the reverse in a rig. It might be OK if they adhered to standards, but they don't. IOW, if the "USB t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00021.html (9,569 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: n7us@arrl.net (Jim McDonald)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:46:56 -0700
Has anyone tried USB 2.0? The newer computers and peripherals have 2.0, and you can buy a board (Belkin ~$80, probably others) to add 2.0 to a PC with a PCI slot. Jim N7US
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00022.html (7,166 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: gisske@offex.com (Edward Gisske)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 09:19:43 -0500
It is certainly possible, but unlikely. Rig manufacturers won't even spend the money to put a functional RS-232 serial port in rigs costing $3K. Instead of putting a MAX232 and 4 capacitors *inside*
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00026.html (8,205 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: W3YY@aol.com (W3YY@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 10:31:27 EDT
I've seen positive reviews about the Belkin board, but I tried adding the Belkin board to a 800 MHz Pentium III and could never get it to communicate with my Palm USB interface. Plus I started experi
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00028.html (7,820 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: nr1dx@arrl.net (Dave)
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 15:34:47 +0000
BOB Under which operating system were you attempting this install? I went through this nearly same scenario about a year ago. Palm/USB interface. It would work under WIN98SE but not any of the NT bas
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00031.html (8,592 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin (VE2DC))
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 12:54:34 -0400
Not so sure... maybe a built in NIC port would be a better idea... or ideally, a fibre connection... but don't hold your breath. For low speed, long cables and RF immunity... the COM ports are pretty
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00032.html (7,577 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] USB, COM, LPT (score: 1)
Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 01:45:03 -0000
It has been a while since I read RS-232C and its first successor, RS-232D, but my recollection is that this standard is simply an electrical specification and never details how the signals should be
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00040.html (11,227 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu