Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] SS amps and auto-tune. Is it even necessary?

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] SS amps and auto-tune. Is it even necessary?
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 01:16:32 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
To me, an amp is an amp, is an amp be it tube or SS and its sole purpose is to give me a louder, clean signal.

When I initially tune up a tube amp it's into a dummy load. On 160, 74 and 40, excursions usually call for the antenna tuner which is done by switching the aim into the antenna tuner. 160 may require a good change in tuning, while 40 may just be a tweak.

Amp is tuned, antenna will show 1:1.0 R=50, switch rig to the antenna.
The SS amp is already tuned, so it just needs an antenna with a 1:1 SWR, or thereabouts. So even with a manual tuner you have remove the tune and load cycle on the amp.

Auto tune gives the same convenience whether tube or SS.
It lends itself to making the SS amp close to instant band switching.
With predistortion they produce signals comparable to good tube amps.
We can get legal limit, auto tune tube amps "for a price".

The only drawback I can see is as I said in the earlier post. The "good ones" (state of the art, if you will) are still in the realm of the "do it yourself", but amp kits, LP filter boards up to 3 KW, and combiner kits are available.

Extra headroom is not much different than with tube amps and in general you need it for similar reasons. With antenna tuners, whether manual or auto there is no excuse for the amp to see a high SWR, except for accidents. An AIM will let you tune far more accurately than is necessary.

73

Roger (K8RI)

On 12/7/2016 7:24 AM, Jim Thomson wrote:
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 18:30:27 -0500
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] SS amps and auto-tune. Is it even necessary?

With first generation SS amps, auto tune was almost a necessity, BUT
with the new amps?

With the current flock of transistors that can handle the wrong antenna
or even an open circuit, auto tune is just a convenient, but expensive
accessory.  A manual tuner will work just fine.

Of course we are still in the "if you want one, you'll have to build it
yourself" stage.  OTOH amplifier, combiner, and LP filter kits are
available and the cost is reasonable. IM is also on par with the best
tube amps.

50% Vs 60%. Who cares?  They are easily water cooled without the
headaches of water cooling a tube amp..

73

Roger (K8RI)

##  You may well be correct, but to put out  1.5 kw into a 2:1 swr.....or 
higher, the amp
will have to be configured to put out 2.5 kw +   into a dummy load.

##  I have yet to see any of these SS amps with good imd, who makes one ?  Im 
not seeing
good imd with any of the published ldmos devices.

##  K9YC pointed out that these SS amps have min imd, when into a 50 ohm 1:1 
swr.   IMD
degrades when into any amount of swr.

##  Having to use a manual tuner with a SS amp is a pita, defeats the entire 
purpose of the SS amp.
##  The combiners and LP filters are not cheap...esp when they have to handle 
1.5 kw CCS into a
2:1  or higher swr.... hence another reason for the auto tuner.   The LDMOS 
device may well handle a
sky high swr for an extreme short period of time... but the LP  filters wont, 
nor will the combiners..or pin
diodes if used for TR qsk.

## water cooled tube amps are a non issue.  The anode fin assy is removed and 
replaced with a few turns
of cu tubing.  Some versions have a sealed assy built around the anode, with 2 
x water leads + standard fittings.
they are typ morphed into teflon tubing, or similar, then into the heat 
exchanger /radiator, with a fan on it....to
dump the extracted heat.   At  3.41 btus  per watt..and say 1.5 kw anode 
dissipation =  5115 btus

## A real small radiator  will handle 5k btu’s easily.  My 2nd auto tranny rad 
in my mustang is small,
only .75 inch thick, and only 11 inch wide x  7.5 inch tall. Rated for 13,000  
BTU... = 3.8 kw CCS.
The 5.75 inch tall version is rated for   9,800  BTU =  2.87 kw CCS.

##  water cooling with the smaller tubes is a pita.  Typ used for industrial 
heating applications, where the
load can be all over the map, and the higher anode dissipation comes in handy.

##  water cooled  SS amps may well be the ticket, provided no leaks, isnt 
subjected to freezing, doesnt corrode
the AL / cu radiator used, hits the dew point / condensation issues etc, etc.
100%  distilled water with no corrosion inhibitor in it could easily destroy 
the radiator assy.  But we are not talking about
HV here, only low voltages like 50 vdc...so corrosion inhibitor or water wetter 
etc, could probably be used ok.

##  Doesnt matter which way you slice it, the SS amp will cost a bunch.   The 
$10K  dishtronix ss amp doesnt have an
auto tuner, has lousy  -30 db pep  IMD3.... but its price and complexity  
reflects the efforts involved.

##  The low cost of the LDMOS is the least of the issues involved.   Its everything 
else that’s involved with the SS amp.

Jim   VE7RF
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>