CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Kenwood repair

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood repair
From: k7jj@arrl.net (Dave Earnest)
Date: Fri May 4 10:13:53 2001
FWIW......... About 5 years ago, I tried a independent Kenwood repair service in
the western U. S. and found it was a complete waste of time and money. I sent in
my TS440S for repair of a specific problem. I was told they could not recreate
the problem and shipped it back to me at my expense. As soon as I turned the
radio on, the problem was there. Being really dumb, I contacted them and sent it
back. Same story, now I am down about $200.00

Even though I had heard horror stories about Kenwood, I sent the radio to 
Kenwood
in California.  I had the radio back within a week and it has worked flawlessly
ever since.

In 1999, my TS850 developed a sensitivity problem. I shipped it to Kenwood and
they repaired it, even putting in a couple of mods, and returned it within a
week. Kenwood made me happy twice.

73,

Dave Earnest, K7JJ

Bob Naumann - N5NJ wrote:

> For Kenwood repair try http://www.avvid.com
>
> Clif Holland KA5IPF runs that business and is honest, and very reasonably
> priced.
>
> I have no affiliation other than as a happy customer.
>
> 73,
> Bob N5NJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Beckwith" <swca@swbell.net>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:52 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood repair
>
>  >
>  >  >After two years and five returns to the Kenwood factory, they told
>  >  >me to go to Hell. I responded that I would go to ham conventions
>  >  >and hand out papers describing accurately my experiences with
>  >  >Kenwood support. They responded by sending me a USED TS-950SDX
>  >  >with fewer filters than were in my broken SDX.
>  >
>  > I would have hoped they'd at least have sent Bill's own filters back.  I
> take
>  > the filters out when I send in the radios.
>  >
>  > I had a similar ongoing situation with Kenwood with my TS-850.  I also
> have a
>  > 950 and two 930s, and I am not inclined to turn my back on Kenwood if only
>  > because of how much I prefer the radios when they ARE working.  The 850
> works
>  > enough to send my callsign and exchange as the second radio.  Mostly it is
> an
>  > SWL rig now.
>  >
>  > But I know this frustration.  One day after Field Day, the receive signals
> just
>  > didn't sound good like they used to.  Then the bad signal reports started
>  > coming
>  > in.  After multiple trips to Kenwood repair, the last time the rig came
> back,
>  > they said over the phone basically:
>  >
>  > "We can't help you, your rig is a pile of junk, we found multiple damaged
>  > components, we don't know what you did, we don't know how to fix it, have
> a
>  > nice
>  > day, that'll be $270."
>  >
>  > So, yes, I also know what Bill went through, and I wish they would have
> offered
>  > ME a working used 850.  I suspect it was a static discharge or Field Day
>  > station
>  > proximity which killed it (all that massive ERP, of course), but it is
>  > definitely "off the mark" now.
>  >
>  > Mark, N5OT
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>  > Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>  >
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com

--
David E. Earnest
k7jj@arrl.net




--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>