| To: | "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>,"Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>, CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? |
| From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:27:47 -00 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > It's still a legitimate skill worthy of reward and worthy of allowing an > operator to rise above the pack if he's able to do it. > > 73, kelly > ve4xt Kelly got it exactly right! See here ----> http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html for another persuasive argument in support. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest calendar for iCal, David Robbins K1TTT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- reclaiming freqs, Michael Dinkelman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?, VE5ZX |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?, Bill Tippett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |