| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision |
| From: | Chris Pedder <chris@g3vbl.co.uk> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:26:32 +0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Yep, Ranko tells us that what he did is the same as running 1780 watts when the limit is 1500 watts. Clearly 1780 watts merits disqualification and, with this in mind, doubtless Ranko will do the honourable thing....... Chris G3VBL/8P9EM At 06:18 07/04/2008, Ernesto, LU5CW wrote: >Hey Ranko, are you serious? if the maximum allowed power is 1500W how >come you think 1780W is OK? > >You are not serious, are you? > >Ernesto >LU5CW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision, Dave/KA1NCN |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2008 EA RTTY - All 3830 Claimed Scores 08Apr2008, mwdink |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX exchange - 4O3A decision, Ernesto Martin Grueneberg |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] USB to Serial Adaptors, Milt, N5IA |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |