CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?
From: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:02:42 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> I hope it wouldn't take another 20 years until freely adopted
> as with DX Cluster.  
 
-The contesters who have freely adopted DX Cluster are those
-who don't know, or don't care, about the difference between
-the internet and amateur radio.

I agree with your premise, but only as it applies to contesters
operating SO.

Multi-Op stations don't have the option of classifying themselves
differently for operating without packet, which clearly provides little
incentive for them to refrain from using it.

David ~ KY1V

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>