CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification

To: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification
From: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:48:57 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Exactly correct.


On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 15:48 Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems clear to me. If the transmitter, receiver and antennas are in
> Virginia, other stations in Virginia are your direct competition (the ones
> who have similar propagation paths to the ones you experience). Your score
> should be compared with theirs. In most contests it would be unfair to
> compare your score, obtained using a station located in Virginia, with the
> scores obtained by stations where the radio equipment is located in Kansas.
> The fact that you are sitting on a chair in Kansas, or Alaska, or Hawaii,
> is or should be irrelevant for purposes of comparing scores, it's the
> location of the radio equipment that matters.
>
> 73,
> Rich VE3KI
>
>
> N0OST wrote:
>
> I don't know much about remote contesting, so if I am sitting in Kansas and
> operating a station in Virginia where is my score posted with the folks in
> VA or KS. ?
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
-- 
73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his radio"™
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>