CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:21:23 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yes.

Quite a few people have major issues with remote radio.

As our contesting population ages I have noticed a great deal of pushback against anything new or any changes that affect what they have done for the last umteen years.

W0MU



On 9/10/2016 2:46 AM, Mike Lonneke via CQ-Contest wrote:

Is there supposed to be some sort of "shame" attached to operating remotely?  
If a detractor would put forth the effort (and considerable expense) to build a 
competitive remote-capable contest station, he would see that contesting remotely is MORE 
difficult than in-shack operating.



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>