| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Dec 2016 20:09:29 -0800 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Tue,12/13/2016 4:51 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: What am I missing here? NAQP has ALWAYS been a "no packet, 100W" contest. That's not a change. Indeed, it's one of the joys of it. And, of course, there are some who don't read or play by the rules. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, Alan Dewey via CQ-Contest |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Ukrainian DX Contest 2016 Claimed Scores, Vladimir Gordienko |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, Stephen Bloom |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, Jim George |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |