| To: | k9yc@arrl.net,cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules |
| From: | Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:40:48 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
This surely hits the nail on the head for me. Thanks Jim. Jim N3BB At 08:09 PM 12/13/2016 -0800, Jim Brown wrote: NAQP has ALWAYS been a "no packet, 100W" contest. That's not a change. Indeed, it's one of the joys of it.73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, w7dra |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, Ken Low |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, Eric Rosenberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |