CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Enforcement - why not power cheating?

To: Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Enforcement - why not power cheating?
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:04:31 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Power rules are a sticky one. They do give a clear advantage. Enforcement
is another matter entirely. You're basically depending on someone to rat
out the cheaters or observers have to be stationed at big gun stations.
It's like doping. There are ways to dope without being detected, but at
some point it becomes fairly obvious what is going on.

I wouldn't throw out the baby with the bathwater just yet...

Ria
N2RJ

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>
wrote:

> For all of this, when I first became a manager, one of my co-workers who
> had been in the military said "we are taught, NEVER give an order that
> won't be followed". The corollary is "never make a rule that won't/can't be
> enforced". At this point in time, self spotting is like that, and probably
> power rules too
>
> --
> 73 de KG2V
> Charlie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>