>I believe that the access list requires the physical radio MAC, not the
>ethernet MAC.
yes
>KarlNet NAT setup has always been a little weird in my
>opinion. The way we set it up to work is by not enabling bridging or
>routing (it does work with bridging enabled but we don't really want it to
>bridge all traffic).
once you get the hang of it, it's actually quite intuitive
if you bridge, you turn off NAT or Routing
if you NAT, you turn off bridging or Routing
if you Route, you turn off bridging or NAT
>Since you need routing for interface 2 and 3 try
>removing the direct route for intf 1 and adding that IP address as the
>private IP in the NAT setup. Good Luck!
we have found A LOT of problems w/ running NAT & Routing at the same
time...IMO, it's best to follow K.I.S.S.
Worst case, just drop a Linksys NAT box behind the Ethernet
-Charles
|