RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...
From: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Reply-to: dave@nk7z.net
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:09:38 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
You have exactly espoused my thoughts here Peter, thank you!
-- 
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info


On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 17:57 -0500, Peter Laws wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I think you are being a slightly paranoid. How are at risk of being sued 
> > for informing someone, especially a law-violator, that they are attracting 
> > attention by generating a nuisance in the community?
> 
> 
> Potential civil actions may not be a big risk, but growing marijuana
> is still a federal crime.  Not sure I'd like to have items with my
> name on them found in a DEA raid, especially if those items told the
> target of the raid how to make his operation easier to hide.  "Aiding
> and abetting" I think is the term they use on all those cop shows.
> 
> *So far* the DoJ is taking a go-slow approach to things in the states
> with state-legal marijuana.  That could change, in either direction,
> at any time.
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>