Yeah, im with you on that Mike..
Owning a cluster, i don't see any issues with S&P spotting, either
manual or automatic
im happy enough your telling me where the multi is, should it matter how
it was done?
that was the intent for the cluster.
If its a issue with high volumes of packet traffic, then filters need to
be used.
On the other hand i fully appose self spotting or spotting on their own
CQ freq.
maby i misunderstood it but i thought that was the intent of the first
posted mail..
73 -
Tony
NN1D
Michael Keane K1MK wrote:
> No one has suggested that spotting stations on your CQ frequency is a
> particularly bright idea.
>
> What has been pointed out is that there is a quite reasonable
> rationale for stations to spot all their S&P QSOs (not recently
> spotted) and for logging programs to automate that operation.
>
> 73,
> Mike K1MK
>
> At 05:47 PM 1/30/07, radioman01 wrote:
>
>
>> So i guess its ok for me to jump in on Ed's CQ freq and work a multi.?
>>
>> because the intent for the cluster network was for operators to spot a
>> station that others might need...
>> spotting a station on your own CQ freq is just going cause you grief.
>>
>> if its not ok for me to jump in on your CQ freq for a multi, what is the
>> intent for your club members?
>>
>>
>> Tony
>> NN1D
>>
>
> Michael Keane K1MK
> k1mk@alum.mit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|