RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe"

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe"
From: Ed Steeble <esteeble@sc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:47:15 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Phil,

I  disagree with your position. First, it is an option in N1MM Logger 
whether or not that "spot all S&P QSOs" is on or off, the default is 
off. While CQing spots are not automatically generated. Secondly, I 
turn it on to help others, especially my club members. Third, I 
appreciate the spots while I am running. Fourth, it helps promote 
RTTY activity. And fifth, it takes too much time to manually spot contacts.

You can filter out most of the unwanted spots.

73, Ed
K3IXD

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:06:18 -0000
From: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
Subject: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe"
To: "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <IBEAKBCDCCOMNLAMPIHEEEBEFIAA.pcooper@guernsey.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi all,

Someone (it may have been Jamie WW3S) wrote that N1MM can be configured to
"automatically" send all spots while in S&P mode.

If this is true, then this feature is a pain! N1MM really ought to disable
this feature, and make spotting a manual affair. There is no good reason to
generate a spot automatically.

I really cannot think of any good reason why someone in S&P mode would want
to spot everything worked. And surely you would notice?
This may well explain why it seems to happen quite a bit lately.
It may also explain some of the announcements one sees on the cluster on
occasions about folk listing their "log".

Maybe someone could QSP this to the N1MM reflector (assuming it is correct)?

73 all

Phil GU0SUP

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>