RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Courtesy

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Courtesy
From: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:29:55 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Having worked RTTY for more than 25 years I thought the use of TU in addition to being Thank You was also the equivalent of QSL, as in, when S&Ping, responding to the running station's exchange by sending: XX1XX TU 599 05 NJ. No extra time needed to be polite, and sometimes it even happens in CW.

73, Dave, K2YG


orig msg:

From: RTTY [rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim W7RY 
[w7ry@centurytel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:55 AM
To:rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Courtesy

I noticed that no one added TU to their QSOs. I guess a simple "thank
you" would take almost half a second too long.

You would have seen TU if you worked me!

It would have been better to say, "no one that I worked said thank you".

73
Jim W7RY


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>