Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Best Height Above Ground for a Beverage RX Antenna

To: w7iuv@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Best Height Above Ground for a Beverage RX Antenna
From: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Reply-to: k2xx@swva.net
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:12:25 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
As a newcomer to 160M, you've raised an issue that was troubling me.  I 
live on a hilltop that slopes off rapidly in all directions, dropping 
about 400', except to the south.  If I were to install Beverage 
antennas, the ends would wind up down in hollows, shielded by higher 
terrain on all sides.  Intuitively, I assumed that the performance would 
not be very good.  (Frankly, the fact that Beverages work at all amazes 
me in the first place.)   I am currently using a 344' doublet for TX and 
RX and it works reasonably well on RX, but my QTH is electrically quiet. 

My question:  do I have anything to gain by going to Beverages on RX and 
even if I do, wouldn't the nature of my terrain considerably reduce 
their effectiveness?  (BTW, I am planning on going to a vertical for TX 
some time in the future.)

I 'd appreciate hearing opinions and experiences from the members of 
this forum on the subject.

Thanks and 73,

Joe
K2XX

 I have some results that indicate it is better to follow the terrain 
> than to suspend over low areas like dry washes and gulleys. I have not 
> been able to verify this observation in enough different locations to be 
> certain it is always true.



_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>