Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor loop coax choices ?

To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor loop coax choices ?
From: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:54:09 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hi Jim, it is not widely known but Belden 8214 does not have a  
non-contaminating jacket.  I just confirmed it on the 8214 data sheet on  their 
website 
to make sure I remembered it correctly.
 
Too bad as it is a very nice coax otherwise.
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
In a message dated 6/11/2015 3:37:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
jim@audiosystemsgroup.com writes:

On  Thu,6/11/2015 1:16 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
> I have nagging doubts about  using cables with a solid foil shield for a 
rotor loop.

I would share  your concern.

> I do like the idea of double shielded cables so  RG213, RG 8 etc are off 
the table for now.

I wouldn't worry about  "double-shielding," but rather the quality of the 
shield. Look through the  Belden catalog for an RG8 or RG213 with a 
robust copper braid shield and  stranded center. Look at 8237, 8268, 
8214. or 9251. All are 97% shield  coverage. Check out vendors like 
Markertek. 9251 has non-contaminating  jacket.  8214 is #11 center; the 
others are #13.

You don't  need a lot of coax for the rotor loop, so cost is hardly a 
factor -- I'd  be more concerned about finding someone to sell you short 
lengths.  :)

73, Jim  K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk  mailing  list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>