VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Re: Recent trends in Logs and Qs, VHF contests

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Re: Recent trends in Logs and Qs, VHF contests
From: croseman@almaak.usc.edu (Curtis C. Roseman)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:19 2003
George et al.:

    Here are some numbers.  First, the number of logs submitted for the
three ARRL VHF/UHF contests since 1975 from QST write-ups (note a few of
these numbers are estimates or interpolations, but the overall trends
should be correct):

        Jan     June    Sept
1975    590     340     285
        630     410     230
        780     490     340
        840     480     330
        890     510     410
1980    995     500     380
        970     540     390
        940     590     448
        950     510     436
        800     590     450
1985    880     530     434
        890     630     460
        840     691     386
        845     650     400
        930     650     425
1990    910     600     439
        912     480     415
        958     610     591
        1036    818     621
        1200    820     714
1995    1150    837     720
        1150    921     710
        1020    837     752
        1010    800     700
        900     701     606
2000    820     710     582
        799     680     553

         Whereas it is true that the numbers are down over the last few
years, the current levels are comparable to (or better than) most of the
1980s and clearly higher than the mid-1970s.

        Now, let's look at the highest national QSO totals on 6 and 2 in
June and Sept (since 1987):

        June    Sept    June    Sept
        Hi Qs   Hi Qs   Hi Qs   Hi Qs
        6mtrs   6mtrs   2mtrs   2mtrs

1987    985     281     615     555
1988    688     338     673     573
1989    366     380     574     672
1990    527     359     656     699
1991    630     396     599     510
1992    976     418     641     870
1993    732     373     778     697
1994    472     417     752     883
1995    558     343     833     702
1996    1161    404     786     643
1997    674     493     864     762
1998    1358    562     770     671
1999    1077    607     725     736
2000    1104    668     655     700
2001    909     957     607     963

        Over the last few years, six meter qso totals have been higher
than EVER, and two meter totals as high as ever.   These data are only for
the single highest total each year, but they reflect the overall trends
for many stations and many regions over the years.  The increase on six
(and perhaps also on two) is partly due to the incorporation of that band
into main-line HF rigs.  QSO totals have generally gone up on other
bands as well, as we have more rovers and others using more and more
bands, and almost ever year several records are broken in various
categories in various regions.  (I have similar data for Grid totals,
which vary quite a bit more from year to year with changing band conditions.)

        In summary, activity is up, but log submissions are down somewhat.
We dont need to change the rules, we need to send in our logs.  (I have
plenty of opinions about proposed rules changes that I may put into
another message.   My overall feeling is that we have plenty of categories
and distance scoring is not a good idea -- because better stations and
operators already are rewarded with distance worked because they get more
grids.  That is the beauty of the grid system; more distance, more
grids.)

73, Curt Roseman k9aks


On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, George Fremin III - K5TR wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:04:46PM +0000, Bill Olson wrote:
> >
> > 1. Is the reason there is a decline in contest activity because the
> > "playing field" is not level???? I don't think so. Look back in old QST's
> > at contest results. There were TWO entr
> > ant categories: Single op, Multiop. And multipliers were arrl sections..
> > not grids. That is about as unequal a playing field as we have ever had,
> > yet there was a LOT of activity. Maybe participation is declining because
> > the ham population is declining or at least the ham population interested
> > in this stuff. Plus there are a LOT more things to do these days!!
>
>
> I really wish someone would give us some hard numbers of this
> "decline in contest activity".  I have seen this thrown up
> several times on this list in the last year but I do not
> recall anyone providing any proof of this "fact".
>
>
> Earlier this year I did look at the numbers of logs submitted
> for the threee major ARRL VHF contests and found that they
> were all within +/- 40-50 entries over those years.
>
> This does not seem like decline to me - it would seem that
> good or bad conditions would have at least this
> much affect on entries.
>
> From personal experiance I would say activity has been up
> but the only proof I have for that is some big 6m scores in the june contests.
>
> Anyway - I guess it just gets to me when I read folks claims of
> declining acvitiy without any proof to back it up.
>
>
> --
> George Fremin III - K5TR
> geoiii@kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>