VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF Contest, a two band contest

To: "Eric NM5M" <nm5m@aol.com>, <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF Contest, a two band contest
From: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@lcisp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:08:15 -0000
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
And if more bands are too complicated for beginners, wouldn't a 1 band
format be EVEN BETTER?  Heck, remove all bands and don't have a contest,
that is even simpler, and you don't have to deal with the log submission
robot.

73s John AA5JG
(ex. W5TD, NE0P)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric NM5M" <nm5m@aol.com>
To: <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:58 PM
Subject: [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF Contest, a two band contest


> I suppose I am at a loss as to why anyone would think the two band format
is better for beginners?  If 432 MHz were available more contacts could be
made by participating stations, how could that be bad?
>
> Eric NM5M
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>