Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2ttt@att.net: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] RFI U-verse (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:19:50 -0800
Jim, Putting a choke on the network feed reduces bandwidth to the service and creates instability. There are other measures that can be applied to eliminate the RF getting into the RG. I can point yo
/archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00111.html (9,480 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] RFI U-verse (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:22:16 -0800
Martin, Your point about filtering at the STB can be effective in certain cases, but never on the network feed. Thanks & 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 Fred, What power level are you running,
/archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00112.html (10,488 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] RFI U-verse (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:11:57 -0800
Jim, A low frequency cutoff strategy can negatively impact overall service stability. The best strategy is to keep the transmitter RF from getting into the cabling and as you said, good cable, proper
/archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00117.html (11,316 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] RFI U-verse (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:47:18 -0800
Chris, I think we have more of a terminology issue here. Common mode isolators/chokes, or as you have called them filters, are of value. I just don't think of them as filters as they do not have band
/archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00124.html (14,216 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] RFI U-verse (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:55:03 -0800
Andy, I'm just offering to help get AT&T U-Verse and DSL customers aligned with Customer Care folks who can help them resolve their issues. Thanks & 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 Oops, I did
/archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00127.html (8,725 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] 30m Interference (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:51:20 -0800
Frank, Did you notice any RFI on 7 or 3.5 MHz from these devices? Thanks & 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 Each time I've had RFI on 30M, it was caused by a mobility scooter's built-in switchi
/archives//html/RFI/2011-06/msg00000.html (8,932 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] 30m Interference (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:29:17 -0800
Frank, Thanks for the guidance. Those techniques are solid and wise. I am generally concerned about any weak signal interference that could possibly be propagated beyond the local environment. We hav
/archives//html/RFI/2011-06/msg00002.html (10,629 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] RFI in a car (score: 1)
Author: "J.Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:42:48 -0800
Dave, Have you bonded EVERY piece of metal to each other with flexible strapping? This needs to include body panels, frame sections, exhaust sections, etc. Doing this should help knock down the 20 RF
/archives//html/RFI/2011-07/msg00024.html (9,543 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] U-Verse (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:44:59 -0400
Pat, Just curious if you have U-Verse as well? Rick, I am curious about your configuration before and now.  If you would like, please give me a call as the ARRL EMC Committee has some experience that
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00021.html (9,246 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1)
Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:25:43 -0400
Hi Folks, Mike Gruber, W1MG at the ARRL has a reporting referral process for broadband carrier issues with Amateur Radio that I helped design as a member if the ARRL's ElectroMagnetic Compatibility C
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00125.html (10,246 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:16:27 -0400
Charlie and Dale, Contact Mike Gruber, W1MG at ARRL and these issues can be worked. 73, Gordon, W2TTT 201.314.6964 Sent from Samsung tablet -- Original message -- From: n0tt1@juno.com Date: 2014/04/1
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00132.html (10,557 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:11:03 -0400
Jim, A more productive approach would be to contact Mike Gruber, W1MG at ARRL and he can guide you and your neighbors to a better place. 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 Sent from Samsung table
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00143.html (9,455 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:57:20 -0400
Dave, Cost is the reason that cable companies and some telcos reuse their existing coax or twisted pairs to go from a point in the neighborhood into homes. 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 Sent
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00149.html (12,813 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:10:40 -0400
Jim, A couple of points... We have all had to address neighbor issues with neighbors of varying levels of ease.  That having been said, we should operate with the minimum power required to do the job
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00150.html (11,255 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:36:13 -0400
Mac, If get the chance to see U-Verse, you will see amazing video quality because it is end to end IPTV delivered to the DVR or set top box.  I have FIOS, and while it is nice, you get the RF modulat
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00154.html (11,737 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] VDSL (very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line) (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:53:16 -0400
Jim, Understood...just put your best Amateur Radio good citizen face on and work with people as long as they are willing to work with you.  Ignorance and bull headedness lead to poor PR for Amateur R
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00155.html (9,998 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] Can you say 'RFI'? Can you say BIG 'Fine'? (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:47:15 -0400
David, Agreed, but it was Ken who commented this time. 73, Gordon, W2TTT ARRL EMC Committee Member 201.314.6964 Sent from Samsung tablet -- Original message -- From: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net> Date:
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00181.html (9,817 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] Can you say 'RFI'? Can you say BIG 'Fine'? (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:12:42 -0400
Ken and David, Can you please email me the handout? W2TTT@att.net and W2TTT@att.com are my email addresses.  Please send it to both if you can. Such things are really helpful in educating both the ge
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00203.html (11,405 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] Can you say 'RFI'? Can you say BIG 'Fine'? (score: 1)
Author: "w2ttt@att.net" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:50:36 -0400
David, That's fine, but send me the url for the club web site or the club's name. 73, Gordon Sent from Samsung tablet -- Original message -- From: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net> Date: 2014/04/26 21:21 (G
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00243.html (13,112 bytes)

20. Re: [RFI] [Bulk] Re: Electric Fence pulsing (will get worse soon !) (score: 1)
Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr." <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:52:26 -0400
Mike, What frequency bands are being impacted by this fence? 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 Maybe the higher power controller will burn off the grass. Can only hope. Dale, k9vuj So, small upd
/archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00121.html (14,143 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu