Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa5rtg@gmail.com: 125 ]

Total 125 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWWCW MULTI-SINGLE (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 08:44:50 -0600
Bob, One station can run or work anyone they want and the station can ONLY work new multipliers. Both stations have to stay on a band ten minutes from first contact on a band before moving to another
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00417.html (7,433 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:52:18 -0500
Thought it said database, recordings or confirming QSOs. If so, make all the notes you want and fix post contest. Should not be an issue Stan, K5GO Sent from Stan's IPhone ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00020.html (15,480 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Art Trampler, K0RO SK (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:05:32 -0500
Following is a post to the CWops group from Jack, N2JT - Art's brother in NJ. Jack and I exchanged several e-mails this morning, and Jack informed me that the funeral is on Monday at Greenlawn North
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00107.html (8,423 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:51:57 -0600
John, Take the same operation that goes on in a successful M/2 operation in a DX contest, including two rigs at each station, skimmer, etc. Turn off the amplifiers and you are ready to go. Stan, K5GO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00319.html (9,503 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP multi-2 strategy (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:45:15 -0600
Actually the top score will have about 1800 contacts and about 300 multipliers. In this example one multiplier equals 6 QSOs. If it is late in the contest, the rates have slowed, the excitement of wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00336.html (8,926 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big Gun hogging two frequencies (K3KU complaint) (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:20:19 -0600
Dave, Absolutely correct. One thing I would add... If you are trying to copy an exchange and someone comes on and sends QRL? I find it is a good idea to respond to that question immediately instead o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00096.html (11,729 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:41:36 -0600
There isn't anything "hard" about any of this. There are, however, considerations regarding the number of categories in some contests, especially ARRL where in some cases awards are made for eighty s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00315.html (15,637 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:29:14 -0600
Martin, I wonder why you believe it is a mistake for assisted to be "penalized" relative to unassisted? I would agree you would have a point if you also thought the WRTC competition should include as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00367.html (11,883 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:52:57 -0600
Martin, Local church sign says "Worry is a total waste of imagination". I think there is too much worry over whether someone might have done something to cheat and not enough time spent trying to imp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00376.html (21,660 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiple Contest Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 05:07:30 -0600
The only downside I can see would be if a club with a hundred not-so-serious about winning members, for example, decided they would try to ensure victory for one of their members who was serious abou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00043.html (14,611 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiple Contest Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:36:19 -0600
Jim, See below... Jim - How might a requirement to cease use of the first call after a second call is used affect the ability for some number of stations to each make a few contacts with one call and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00056.html (10,319 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Sunday (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 21:36:01 -0600
This thread caused me to take a look at the SS records page. I was thrilled to see that my good friend John Dormois won the 4th CW SS in 1933. I don't remember him ever telling me that fact, but he e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00159.html (7,394 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sunday afternoon boredom is the wet blanket on SS (was Rules off the table ?) (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:44:50 -0600
Best post on subject I've seen. If all band contacts were allowed you need to be well-equipped on all five bands. I have always thought it possible to make the top ten from here operating single band
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00212.html (10,957 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Sundays (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:52:17 -0600
Jim, I fail to see where forbidding the use of a previous call after the use of a new one does anything to prevent any abuse. Drop 3.3 and 3.5 and allow someone to use as many calls as they want as l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00269.html (8,939 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Cheating in ARRL using the cluster (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:08:12 -0600
Seems to me that a published black list should be made and used to filter out bad spots before they ever get to everyone's computer. EK3LR, for example, should not show up on anyone's screen. On a se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00353.html (17,627 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:51:55 -0600
We posted our score to the RU site in the last contest for the first time and, although hesitant about doing that, I'll admit it was fun and entertaining. Can't say I would have felt exactly the same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00496.html (8,617 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:44:38 -0600
Pete, I did see what you posted. That is not what I am talking about. What you did was click on spots and work them - with some filtering but nothing new. I've never tried it, but what does Skimmer o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00514.html (12,721 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:38:34 -0600
Gary, I don't think any opinions about what it takes to be a "player" have anything to do with the subject at hand. You can say you aren't a player if you live in W6 or you are not a player if you do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00518.html (14,132 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:46:26 -0600
Gerry, I'm absolutely not saying the sky is falling. In fact in my original post i said it was not a HUGE problem - mainly because if the number of people using it. At what level of activity would it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00536.html (17,058 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:10:16 -0600
It doesn't matter if all the single ops leave off the band breakdowns. The same opening notifications and more will be available by looking at the multi-operator categories - particularly M/M. As it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00557.html (14,422 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu