Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:xxw0qe@comcast.net: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:22:44 -0600
Ok guys I will do the experiment. I believe I know the answer but validation is always a good thing. Here is what I will do: 1.) Start with a #10 or #12 self supporting copper wire dipole that is abo
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00405.html (11,217 bytes)

42. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (Results of experiment) (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:21:07 -0600
Here are the results of the experiment: 1.) Dipole was made with #10 bare copper wire each side 12.0" long. 2.) Disks are 2.02" diameter x 0.01: thick copper with hole in center for #10 wire. 3.) 8ft
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00415.html (9,760 bytes)

43. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (Results of experiment) (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:29:47 -0600
Yikes! I have received several personal comments since I posted the results. I guess some folks don't want to comment publicly. I did the test since the arguments being made weren't proving anything.
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00418.html (11,936 bytes)

44. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (Results of experiment) (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:34:22 -0600
Darn, I just finished cleaning up the experiment and it is now in the trash. I didn't think there were any follow up test to do. I did the test at 33% and 66% of the distance from the center and am q
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00422.html (13,139 bytes)

45. Re: [Amps] Tuned Input for G-G 50Mhz amp (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:46:40 -0600
We generally think of PI networks as "low pass" and Tee networks as "high pass" but there are PI networks and Tee networks of both "low pass" and "high pass" topologies. A low pass PI network (CLC) a
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00453.html (8,470 bytes)

46. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:28:00 -0600
Please re-read the results of the experiment. Tests #3 and #4 did exactly what you are suggesting. Larry, W0QE _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00466.html (13,826 bytes)

47. Re: [Amps] L and C "meter" (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:34:00 -0600
I also agree that the AADE L/C meter is a great deal and a very easy kit to build. Bear in mind that the measurement frequency used is NOT RF but a variable frequency that I think goes as high as a f
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00809.html (9,101 bytes)

48. [Amps] Hipot testing vs RF breakdown (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:14:32 -0600
Occasionally I wish to Hipot some parts such as relays or capacitors. Has anyone ever seen a factor relating 60Hz breakdown voltage to RF breakdown voltage in the HF range? The only thing I seem to f
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00816.html (7,185 bytes)

49. Re: [Amps] LCR meter (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:30:07 -0600
Here are some real numbers I just measured on a network analyzer calibrated at the plane of the core being measured. Core = T94-2 powdered iron u=10, 22 turns #18 occupying about 80% of core Msmt. fr
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00883.html (8,928 bytes)

50. Re: [Amps] LCR Meter (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:42:21 -0600
Jack, K8ZOA wrote a very in depth review of the AADE L/C IIB recently. The link was published here a few days ago but here it is again http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/aade_l_c_iib_meter_review.htm
/archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00073.html (10,153 bytes)

51. Re: [Amps] Cleaning air-wound coils (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 10:40:59 -0600
Thanks for the plug Dan. I did the tests you mentioned primarily at 28MHz a couple years ago. Increasing the wire size 1 gauge is better than silver plating assuming you have adequate spacing between
/archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00061.html (10,463 bytes)

52. Re: [Amps] New HF amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:05:19 -0600
What are you using as the basis for this blanket comment? There is absolutely nothing wrong with tapped toroids. What causes problems is treating them as is usually done for air core coils which have
/archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00006.html (7,583 bytes)

53. Re: [Amps] New HF amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:54:58 -0600
Jim, Yes the comments hold true period! Flux in any core with shorted turns will cause extra loss with the exception of a type -0 core which has u=1. I have seen shorted turns on a toroid core causin
/archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00016.html (10,857 bytes)

54. Re: [Amps] Automotive Relays (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:33:48 -0600
Another vote would be for the Schrack/Tyco RTD14012F relay. It is 16A and sells for only a little more than the relay Dave mentioned as a P&B branded relay. It is also available in an orange shell wi
/archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00026.html (9,560 bytes)

55. [Amps] Shorted turns experiment (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:40:48 -0600
Carl and Denny, Hope you don't mind me butting in here. I had a private exchange with another guy and will post an experiment I did here as it might help. This following reply was in reference to a p
/archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00047.html (10,434 bytes)

56. Re: [Amps] Automotive Relays (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 10:28:28 -0600
David, It doesn't! Look at the relay specs closely and you will see that very few relays have any gold in the contacts if they are rated above a few amps. I spec'd the use of 10's of millions of rela
/archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00088.html (13,760 bytes)

57. [Amps] PCB test for the 12A & 16A power relays (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:33:32 -0600
Jim, W8ZR recently mentioned his preference for the RTB140XX 12A relay over the RTD140XX 16A relay for switching legal limit RF. His preference was because the RTB relay only uses 1 pin per contact c
/archives//html/Amps/2010-08/msg00115.html (8,918 bytes)

58. Re: [Amps] Skin depth: silver plating of tank circuit coil feasible with chemical plating kits? (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:57:28 -0600
Take a look at http://www.bnk.com/w0qe/inductor_Q_tests.html where I made a bunch of measurements. Silver is a 7% better conductor than copper but at RF the skin depth is inversely proportional to th
/archives//html/Amps/2010-10/msg00008.html (14,399 bytes)

59. Re: [Amps] Attenuator needed (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:33:42 -0700
Vic, Be careful as the attenuators are rated for dissipation and not power input. Therefore a 50W 3dB attenuator is usable with a 100W input where a 50W 6dB attenuator is only usable with a 66.7W inp
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00260.html (10,244 bytes)

60. Re: [Amps] Insulation tester (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:47:19 -0700
Don, I use an ignition transformer for a fuel oil furnace to test breakdown voltages. These are 120VAC primary and a grounded center tapped secondary of 6kVAC to 12kVAC. They are readily available, a
/archives//html/Amps/2010-11/msg00493.html (10,185 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu