Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Power\s+transformer\s+for\s+600\s+watt\s+rig\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:47:23 -0400
To the techies on this list. I am designing a power supply using LTspice and need some numbers. Just had a thought that you might be able to answer a question I have. Do you know about what the vario
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00154.html (6,923 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:47:28 -0400
You need to first define what the 600 watt rig is. SSB PEP power or an AM rig. What kind of voltage regulation do you need/want. Full wave voltage doubler or full wave bridge, capacitor or choke inpu
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00155.html (8,674 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:47:15 -0400
Gary: Do you have LTspice? I will plug those numbers into the transformer model to complete the design. The numbers I quoted are adequate for the problem as stated. - Jim Tonne ______________________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00158.html (7,102 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:08:59 -0400
Hi Jim, No I don't have LTspice. What I was saying about what type of service the power supply is to expect to see matters a great deal. A transformer (a good one) that is to be used with a voltage d
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00163.html (8,621 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:37:22 -0400
I guess I dont understand the need to use a program for this. Simply give your operational requirements to any transformer company such as Magcap and Heyboer and let them figure it out. Carl KM1H ___
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00164.html (10,057 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: Pat Barthelow <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:11:46 -0700
This is quite informative...Question, From Gary's comment about Secondary Resistance, and choke input power supplies, not sufficient for SSB dynamic regulation, if one has available an older power su
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00165.html (10,484 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:14:54 -0400
Hi Pat, The biggest problem with a choke input filter is the transient response of the choke with SSB. It will allow the voltage to dip quite a bit on some of the voice peaks as the amplifier demands
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00169.html (12,525 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:55:06 -0700
of Speaking of tuned-chokes: I've built several power supplies over a many year period using this method. Some worked well, some didn't. I've always used the method that I thought was the only metho
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00170.html (8,815 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:43:07 -0400
SSB is less critical than a Class AB or B modulator as far as PS requirements which is why a single capacitor is capable of sufficient filtering. For a modulator a choke input is used and it is not a
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00172.html (14,881 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:07:17 -0400
See my post to Gary. Also check out old Thordason, Kenyon, UTC and other 1930's-50's catalogs available on line for resistance values of fixed and swinging chokes. Carl KM1H _________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00173.html (12,197 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:21:29 -0400
Filtering isn't the problem. Dynamic regulation is a problem with a choke. You get severe voltage drops when current is drawn at an audio rate from the power supply. A swinging choke is even worse th
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00174.html (17,742 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: warren@wpratt.com
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:11:16 -0700
I can't comments on the swinging choke, I haven't looked at that. However, I've done quite a bit of modeling of a design I'm planning and find that a tuned choke does not solve the dynamic regulation
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00175.html (10,947 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:12:41 -0400
That is in complete disagreement with reality. A swinging choke is even worse than a regular choke. They Tell me the difference between a Class B amp and a Class B modulator requirements. I have many
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00176.html (20,055 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:50:07 -0400
The same problems exist with either. However with a modulator, often it is powered from the same supply as the finals are and there is a heavy static load on the power supply. The percentage of curr
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00177.html (14,055 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:40:20 -0400
Incorrect. Long established practice often utilizes seperate supplies as the voltages are often different or the total current is too much for a single supply. I suggest that you at least research th
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00178.html (17,895 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:33:24 -0400
No I said that if you were going to use a choke that it should be a tuned choke. There is no way that you will get good dynamic regulation with a regular choke or a swinging choke in an SSB power su
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00179.html (9,370 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:08:32 -0400
And you continue to dance to your own drummer and ignore over 70 years of proven application. Static regulation may be fine with a choke but not dynamic That makes absolutely no sense. Models are onl
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00180.html (10,329 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:41:48 -0400
I would suggest that you might want to read some of the modern stuff on power supplies but if you have no interest and feel it is a waste of time then this discussion is pointless. 73 Gary K4FMX ___
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00181.html (11,457 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:20:09 -0700
What if . . . one had a choke (swinging, or otherwise) input AND lots of capacitance? 73, Barrie, W7ALW _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00182.html (8,309 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Power transformer for 600 watt rig (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:04:42 -0400
It became pointless when you started insisting that a swinging choke was useless for SSB. I suggest that you quit while you arent too far off in the woods yet. My comments were based upon solid engin
/archives//html/Amps/2008-03/msg00183.html (12,881 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu