Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+to\s+FCC\.\.\.\s*$/: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:25:24 -0700
See: http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-to-fcc-grow-light-ballast-causes-hf-interference-violates-rules This is great news! -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00045.html (6,958 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh" <bipi@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:02:42 -0700
Now if they would recall all the damn plasma TV's out there doing the same thing it would really tickle my butt cheeks...but, any such action is goodness! 73 de Mike K7PI next door to a neighbor with
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00046.html (8,703 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:13:34 -0700
This is great news! It's about time. This horse has been out of the barn for at least ten years in the form of switch mode power supplies for low voltage lighting. IMO, ARRL has been asleep at the sw
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00047.html (7,859 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:23:08 -0500
The plasma problem has taken care of its self....mfg of the screens has been discontinued. You can Google it for more info. Now we just gotta wait till they all fail. 73 David Harmon K6XYZ Sperry, OK
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00048.html (9,512 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:38:44 -0700
But what about the millions already sold? 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00049.html (7,497 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:06:08 -0400
Test 'em. They may survive, but they'll never be the same. https://www.rmcybernetics.com/images/main/eng/plasma-gun-2-open.jpg Cortland KA5S 73, Jim K9YC _____________________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00050.html (8,030 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:26:27 -0500
Jim....you didn't quote the answer to your question.... I said...." The plasma problem has taken care of its self....mfg of the screens has been discontinued. You can Google it for more info. Now we
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00051.html (8,251 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:13:56 -0700
It appears that Sears has removed this product from their catalog. I go to the URL of the report and it is not there! -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00052.html (9,364 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "David Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:18:01 -0500
Great....still more good news! 73 David Harmon K6XYZ Sperry, OK It appears that Sears has removed this product from their catalog. I go to the URL of the report and it is not there! -- Thanks and 73'
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00053.html (9,532 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:22:49 -0700
How mant times have you contacted the FCC regarding the interference to your licensed service? Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00060.html (7,686 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 03:32:31 -0500
But we aren't the policemen/women. That is why as taxpayer we hire that job out. The problem TV's should have never made it to store shelves. Ditto for junk dimmers, wall wort PS, grow lights etc, et
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00061.html (8,713 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:29:17 +0000
Using this logic, we should never have to call the fire department when our house catches fire because we aren't firemen. The FD should have inspected every wire or possible fire hazard before we mov
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00062.html (11,237 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:06:44 -0500
How is this viewpoint helping to solve your RFI problems? Oh, and how much are you willing to pay to beef up the FCC's Enforcement division to chase down and eradicate every one of these RFI sources,
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00063.html (10,477 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:44:52 -0400
It was Congress that caused this problem by gutting the FCC and only Congress can cure it. I think it will be more productive complaining to our Congresspeople than to an impotent FCC. 73, Roger N1RJ
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00065.html (9,190 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:53:35 -0500
I think you all are missing the point. The idea is to be proactive and stop the junk from ever hitting the shelves in the first place. True, it's too late for the junk that's already out there, If yo
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00066.html (8,746 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:19:12 -0500
I'll ask again: How does this help you solve your RFI problem? This may help vent your spleen, but I don't understand how this helps solve your immediate problem. I await enlightenment. Kim N5OP "Peo
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00068.html (10,103 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:37:07 -0500
Well Kim, the short answer is, I'm not willing to go to war with my next door neighbor. Sure, I could complain to the FCC and may or may not get relief, but I'd still have to live next door to my nei
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00069.html (11,029 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:52:20 -0700
Hi Dale, I actually don't care if the neighbor takes kindly or not to his $1000.00 plasma TV messing up my $2000.00 radio... I have no intention of becoming so politically correct as to lose my hobby
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00070.html (13,001 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:05:37 -0400
Good point Dale. Does a JR operator plug the hole in his marble bag, then pick up the ones that escaped, or does he let the bag empty out and then start picking them up ?. Hmmm Reducing the size of g
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00071.html (9,186 bytes)

20. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:38:36 -0700
What, exactly, did you have to tell the FCC to get them to notifiy this ass? Did you have to DF the problem yourself, or did you simply have to tell the FCC that "someone" was seriously interfering w
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00072.html (9,398 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu