Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,
From: w4eto@rainbow.rmii.com (Richard W. Ehrhorn)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 07:42:49 -0600


-----Original Message-----
From:   Rich Measures [SMTP:measures@vc.net]
Sent:   Saturday, April 10, 1999 2:56 AM
To:     'amps@contesting.com'   
Subject:        RE: [AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,


>?  Adjusting C-tune makes little difference in the anode resonance since
>C-tune is effectively in series with C-anode, which is much smaller.
>
> >[Richard W. Ehrhorn]  <<< A sweeping generalization which is not 
> >necessarily true. In many cases - such as big tetrodes tuned by vacuum 
>>variables - Tune Cmin may be considerably smaller than tube Cout... right?
>
> ?  Surely.  The 8973 has 160pF of C-anode.  At 29.5MHz, C-tune would 
probably be around 100pF.    However, in a SB-220 the measured anode 
resonant freq. changes little between 80m and 10m operation.  

But one example does not a universe make.

73,  Dick 

Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>