Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:55:38 -0700


>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  Rich Measures [SMTP:measures@vc.net]
>Sent:  Friday, April 09, 1999 1:43 AM
>To:    Amps Reflector
>Subject:       Re: [AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>Agreed. Still you can design an HF amp to be unconditionally stable and
>>>>test for that condition as well.
>>>
>>>?  Tuning the HF tank circuit and disconnecting the hf load have
>>>virtually nothing to do with what is happening in the anode-resonant
>>>circuit where the parasitic oscillations take place.
>>
>>Ah contrair!  You yourself have said that the anode-resonant circuit is
>>composed of Ctune.  Is not Ctune in the tank circuit???
>>Sooooooo.......tuning the tank circuit DOES make a difference.
>>
>?  Adjusting C-tune makes little difference in the anode resonance since
>C-tune is effectively in series with C-anode, which is much smaller.
>
>[Richard W. Ehrhorn]  <<< A sweeping generalization which is not 
>necessarily true. In many cases - such as big tetrodes tuned by vacuum 
>variables - Tune Cmin may be considerably smaller than tube Cout... right?
>
?  Surely.  The 8973 has 160pF of C-anode.  At 29.5MHz, C-tune would 
probably be around 100pF.    However, in a SB-220 the measured anode 
resonant freq. changes little between 80m and 10m operation.  



Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>