>
>> The curious part of this whole business was the location of the heating.
>> With turns on BOTH sides of the tap involved, I have to wonder what,
>> exactly, was going on there. In the past, when I've melted down tank coils,
>> the heating (and deformation) was confined to the center of the active area
>> of the coil. Has anyone else seen this effect?
>>
>IMO, the heating was at the tap point, spreading out each way. Chances are
>the "black" area would have spread with time.
>
>There has been mention on the reflector of directing cooling air on a coil
>to prevent "melt down." This does nothing about the losses due to under-
>engineering. RF is being converted into heat and does not reach the antenna.
>Heat can be eliminated by selecting the proper components for the job to
>be done.
Copper has a positive temp. coefficient. The hotter it gets, the more
resistance. Cooling air is helpful.
> Hans and I are in agreement....there is a limit to how small you can
>make an RF deck.
>
>The same is true about band switches. One must take into consideration not
>only the voltage and current rating, but also the distance between contacts
>when selecting the proper component.
>
? Measuring the actual withstanding voltage is not a bad idea.
cheers, Phil
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|